BankofNH DreamBig 728x90

Letter Submission

To submit a letter to the editor, please email us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Letters must contain the author's name, hometown (state as well, if not in New Hampshire) and phone number, but the number will not be published. We do not run anonymous letters. Local issues get priority, as do local writers. We encourage writers to keep letters to no more than 400 words, but will accept longer letters to be run on a space-available basis. Editors reserve the right to edit letters for spelling, grammar, punctuation, excessive length and unsuitable content.


How many gun owners could you kill to take their firearms away?

To The Daily Sun,

One recent Sunday morning, America woke up to hear of the most outrageous terrorist attack on us since 9-11-2001. While the bloody bodies still lay where they fell, President Hussein Obama held a major press appearance and without any knowledge of the facts, blamed the whole thing on me and you — American gun owners, the NRA, and that damn Second Amendment of the Bill of Rights. Shortly there after we learn that the shooter considered himself a soldier for the Islamic state, and was a registered Democrat.
No wonder the left wing extremists among us are upset to the point of insanity! Yellow journalism disguised as a history lesson from Mr. Cracraft. It takes some kind of mental gymnastics to paint Trump supporters as some kind of Third Reich while they are the ones promoting violence and organizing brown shirt thugs to start trouble. And please don't ever tell us again that "nobody wants to take away your guns."
As for Ms. Loesch, where do you begin? Incredulously, she claims that gun owners use them at will without penalty. Apart from the thousands of laws and regulations in place that either don't work or are not enforced, she is describing the freedom that we as Americans enjoy. She is trying to tell you that the Revolutionary War was fought with muskets so that should be good enough for us as well. Really Bernie? Any one with a clear vision of firearm development in our history knows that people had access to and used the most modern gun designs available at the time. For instance, lever action repeaters were introduced in small numbers during the Civil War. Within 15 years, everybody was using them including the Indians. Then came the next wonder weapon, the bolt-action rifle. Soon the whole world was using them for war but also for sport. Next came the self-loading guns, introduced to the world well over one hundred years ago. By the 1930's anyone with $175 could buy a Thompson machine gun. The fact is that we as Americans have always had access to military-style guns, because it is our birthright.
It is reported now that, since BHO came into power, there have been 52,000 background checks done for gun transfers every single day. There are around ten million AR-15's alone and maybe 100 million other self loading guns too. Who is so delusional to think that is possible to even track them all down? Who is so stupid to think that if we just ban them that they will all go away? How many gun owners would you be willing to kill to take them Bernadette? You are the one making cowardly threats against our civil rights.
So go on, you sniveling "progressive" socialist fascist lefties. Throw your hissy fit tantrums, and your vile lies about American gun owners. Do your sit ins, marches, candle light vigils or chain yourself to a fence somewhere for all I care. You are not fooling any one. Gun control has always been a losing argument for you. But then again socialists are slow learners.
Alan Moon


  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 344

Pat Buchanana - Why Trump is routing the free traders

In Tuesday's indictment of free trade as virtual economic treason, The Donald has really set the cat down among the pigeons. For, in denouncing NAFTA, the WTO, MFN for China and the Trans-Pacific Partnership, all backed by Bush I and II, Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan, Trump is all but calling his own party leaders dunderheads and losers.

And he seems to be winning the argument.

As he calls for the repudiation of "globalism" and a return to "Americanism," a Republican Congress renders itself mute on whether it will even vote on the TPP this year.

On trade, Bernie Sanders is closer to Trump. Even Hillary Clinton has begun to renounce a TPP she once called the "gold standard" of trade deals.

Where have all the troubadours of free trade gone? Why do economic patriots seem ascendant? Is this like the Cold War, where the other side gets up and goes home?

Answer: As Trump pointed out in Monessen in the Mon Valley of Pennsylvania, the returns from free trade are in, and the results are rotten.

Since Bush I, we have run $12 trillion in trade deficits, $4 trillion with China. Once a Maoist dump, China has become the greatest manufacturing power on earth. Meanwhile, the U.S. has lost 50,000 factories and a third of its manufacturing jobs.

Trump is going to start a "trade war," wail the critics. But the damage wreaked upon U.S. industry by free traders already rivals what Arthur "Bomber" Harris did for German industry in the Ruhr.

In recent decades, every major U.S. trade partner — China, Japan, Canada, Mexico, EU — has run annual trade surpluses at our expense. How do 40 years of trade deficits in goods, run by a nation that rarely ran one for a century before, make us stronger or wealthier?

Or is what is best for the world now more important than what is best for America?

And here we come to the heart of the argument. Washington, Hamilton, and Henry Clay, father of the "American System," and Lincoln and every Republican president up to Eisenhower, crafted trade policies to promote manufacturing to grow the wealth of the USA.

They were patriots not globalists.

They knew that America's political independence required economic independence of all other nations. They wanted to build an economy where Americans would cut their bonds to foreign lands and come to rely upon one another for the needs and necessities of their national life. They sought to make us independent, so that we could not be dragged by economic ties into the inevitable wars of the Old World.

And they succeeded magnificently.

Britain, which embraced free trade in the 1840s, became so reliant on imports that a few dozen German submarines almost knocked her out of World War I. Protectionist America had to come pull her chestnuts out of the fire.

Free trade ideology is not America-made. It is an alien faith, a cargo cult, smuggled in from the old continent, the work of men Edmund Burke called "sophisters, economists, and calculators."

David Ricardo, James and John Stuart Mill, Richard Cobden, all chatterers and scribblers, none of whom ever built a great nation, declared free trade to be the new New Testament, the salvation of mankind. These men in whose souls the old faith was dying seized on a utopian belief that world government and free trade would be the salvation of mankind. The Economist magazine was founded to preach the heresy.

Before the modern era, Americans never bought into it. But now, our elites have. And, undeniably, there are beneficiaries to free trade.

There are first the owners, operators and shareholders of companies who, to be rid of high-wage American labor, moved production to China or Mexico or where the costs are lower and regulations near nonexistent. Transnational companies, their K Street lobbyists, and media that survive on their advertising dollars, are the biggest boosters of free trade, as they are the biggest beneficiaries.

Consumers, too, at least initially, see more products down at the mall, selling at lower prices. Cheap consumer goods are the bribes free traders proffer to patriots to sell out their country and countrymen to capitalists who have no country.

But we are not simply consumers. We are Americans. We are fellow citizens. We are neighbors. We have duties to one another.

When a factory shuts down and a town begins to die, workers are laid off. The local tax base shrinks, education and social services are cut. Folks go on unemployment and food stamps. We all pay for that.

Wives go to work and kids come home from school to empty houses, and families break up, and move away. Social disintegration follows. "Creative destruction" is the antiseptic term free traders use to describe what they have done and are doing to the America we grew up in.

Southeast of the old Steel City, in the Mon Valley of Pennsylvania, where my mother and her six brothers and her sister grew up, folks describe what happened more poignantly and graphically.

(Syndicated columnist Pat Buchanan has been a senior advisor to three presidents, twice a candidate for the Republican presidential nomination and the presidential nominee of the Reform Party in 2000. He won the New Hampshire Republican Primary in 1996.)

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 394