Letter Submission

To submit a letter to the editor, please email us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Letters must contain the author's name, hometown (state as well, if not in New Hampshire) and phone number, but the number will not be published. We do not run anonymous letters. Local issues get priority, as do local writers. We encourage writers to keep letters to no more than 400 words, but will accept longer letters to be run on a space-available basis. Letters may be edited for spelling, grammar, punctuation and legal concerns.


I've lived through too many conflicts where thousands of lives were lost

To The Daily Sun,

How many more thousands have to die to satisfy the Republican armchair hawks' anger against President Obama? He is right in wanting to work with other countries in order to formulate a better and realistic solution. There has to be a better plan than unilateral, blind, all-out war. I've lived through too many conflicts where thousands of lives were lost and the outcome is more hatred, death and destruction. Yes, that refers to George W's needless invasion of Iraq, which led to thousands of Americans and Iraqis dead and wounded, turned Iraq into a failed state, blew up the Middle East, and laid the groundwork for ISIS.

It's already been 25 years since George H.W. Bush began the "Bush Family Excellent Adventure" in Iraq and Afghanistan that we are still paying the price for. There are Americans fighting and dying there who weren't even born when Bush senior started it all.

Then his son decided to invade Iraq, destroy those famous weapons of mass destruction which never existed. He bull-headedly ignored investigators from around the world who were telling him there weren't any. He also said he was going to bring democracy to that part of the world. We're still waiting for it, and that goal is further away because of his actions.

So why are we still repeating the same mistakes over and over? We hear talk of America's "credibility" and "need to lead." Sounds like the same things we were told about Vietnam. Some zombie ideas never die.

And many of my high school classmate's names are etched on the Vietnam Wall. Nixon was elected on the false premise and promise that he would get the United States troops out of the Vietnam War within a few months if he was elected to the presidency. Well, it lasted for many more years.

This begs the question: what did we get out of that one? We have thousands of children suffering from the devastating effects of Agent Orange. I worked as a parent/child advocate with parents of multiply handicapped children suffering from both physical and developmental disabilities in order to try and get them the educational and ancillary services needed to take care of these children long term. These children were born with the defective damaged genes that were passed on to them from their fathers who were exposed to Agent Orange.

Bernadette Loesch


  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 319

14 of the 15 top mouncher states are Republican-run states

To The Daily Sun,

I read with interest Marc Abear's letter on the economic freedom of states that rejected the expansion of Medicaid. I have always found the laboratories of the states to be of great interest. I wonder what economic freedom really means, though. What can the states actually teach us? Firstly, in a recent 2014 Wallet-Hub study, the top 14 of 15 "moocher" states turned out to be Republican-run states.

This is because the feds have to make up the revenue shortfalls in Republican-run states that keep wages low with right-to-work laws and have state income and corporate tax rates that are lower than the rest of the nation. With less revenue collected due to this alleged "economic freedom," Republican-controlled states receive inordinately more federal government provided revenue than states with higher tax rates.

These allegedly economically freer states receive a higher percentage of return for every dollar they paid in federal taxes. Moocher states are dependent on federal funding from other states that receive a lower percentage of return for their tax dollars to support their low taxes and "economic freedom." In other words, the economic freedom of many red states costs the rest of us who are more fiscally responsible with gathering revenues.

According to the U.S. Census Bureau's 2014 American Community Survey, the 10 poorest states are Mississippi, West Virginia, Arkansas, Alabama, Kentucky, Tennessee, Louisiana, New Mexico, South Caroline, and Montana. All but one (Alaska) of the richest states were Democratic-controlled states. New Hampshire was seventh. Of the fourteen states with the highest unemployment rates, all but California and Oregon were Republican-run states.

The 10 least healthy states are Mississippi, Arkansas, Louisiana, Kentucky, Oklahoma, Tennessee, West Virginia, Alabama, North Carolina, Indiana. The 10 healthiest states were mostly blue states, but Republican-controlled Utah (no surprise), Nebraska, and North Dakota made the list. Of the top six states on food stamps, all but Oregon are Republican-run states. In states that did not expand Medicaid, the obvious has happened. While the rate of uninsured people ages 19 to 64 living in poverty was 17 percent in Medicaid expanded states, the rate was 36 percent in states that didn't expand Medicaid as of June 2014. All but three of the least healthy states are states that did not expand Medicaid. West Virginia, Arkansas, and Kentucky want to get off that list. The 20 poorest states in income are all Republican-run states, and all but seven have refused to expand Medicaid. In matters of infant mortality rates, red states once again dominate. This is also true of gun murder, obesity, STDs, divorce, high school dropout, teen pregnancy, and church attendance rates.

Not expanding Medicaid also costs lives because expanded coverage reduces mortality rates. But as we all know, the "principles" of the Tea Party's version of capitalism are more important to TeaBilly than human lives. Except fetuses, that is.

James Veverka

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 296