To The Daily Sun,
Mike Cryans and a bunch of Democrats are disgracefully trying to extract the endorsement of Republican Ray Burton, who, unfortunately is no longer with us. They have invoked Mr. Burton's name in every single letter in the newspaper, every interview, and at every campaign appearance. They even went to the tasteless extreme of sending out emails of support for Mr. Cryans from an email address that appears as if it belonged to the late Mr. Burton. It seems that this imaginary postmortem endorsement is the cornerstone of Mike Cryans entire campaign.
Left-wing letter writers such as E. Scott Cracraft have also labeled Mr. Cryans opponent as an extremist. The examples cited by Cracraft are exactly the reasons I support Joe Kenney. There is nothing extreme about not wanting to fund abortions with tax dollars.
In the past several years or so I witnessed the late Ray Burton at several political events raising money for candidates that Cracraft and company would consider much more extreme then Joe Kenney, so Cracraft's arguments do not hold water. The Democrats and Cryans campaign have conducted themselves in the most disrespectful and disgusting manner possible, perhaps, because they have nothing positive to run on.
Who do you trust to look out for your best interest, the banker or the Marine? I'll take the Marine, he spent a lifetime defending Americans, not picking their pockets. Vote Joe Kenney.
Marine Corps veteran
Last Updated on Tuesday, 25 February 2014 10:41
To The Daily Sun,
You may have been hearing about Common Core but have not understood what it is or why it's controversial. I heard a very good analogy that might help you to understand why the concerns exist.
An older woman came up to me last Friday and said, "Young man, are you fighting the new national educational standards?" I said, "Yes ma'am I am." She said, "My great-grandchildren start public school next fall and I've read everything I could about these new standards and who wrote them and why we have them here in New Hampshire. Please tell me if you believe this analogy to be true......
Suppose when they got to school my young ones were told that Governor Hassan required them to have new replacement milk that was bio-engineered by people who had never bio-engineered any other food before. Also that this new milk substitute had never been tested with humans for side effects, and yet all New Hampshire schoolchildren were required to drink it. Suppose still the new milk substitute was going to cost us taxpayers more in the school budget, and then we learn that the governor and commissioner of education knew there was better and cheaper milk available that had been in use for years but still they want this replacement milk forced on my babies. Do I have that right?"
She had it exactly right.
Last Updated on Tuesday, 25 February 2014 10:37
To The Daily Sun,
As a proud Republican, I must say that I am sincerely disappointed with our party's nominee for Executive Council. Joe Kenney, a Tea Partier with a record of intolerance and obstruction, will not be receiving my vote on March 11.
Kenney seems intent on making this campaign centered on issues that will never come before the Executive Council. Why does someone who approves state contracts and judicial appointments believe he can influence legislation? That's not his role, and not what I expect from an executive councilor.
Take the gas tax, for instance. This issue will surely come before the House and Senate, and be resolved in the House and Senate. If Joe Kenney is so determined to get involved in this issue, perhaps he should make a run for the state Senate rather than the Executive Council.
The Democratic nominee, Mike Cryans, has the right idea about what an executive councilor does. A moderate with a proven track record of reaching across the aisle and delivering real results to his constituents, Cryans is the ideal successor to Ray Burton. It's no surprise that Burton's own family endorsed him earlier this month.
Mike Cryans can count on my support on March 11.
Last Updated on Tuesday, 25 February 2014 10:32
To The Daily Sun,
It's an unfortunate reality these days that the first casualty in politics is usually the truth. Take this year's special election for Executive Council in District 1. At a recent debate in Meredith, Joe Kenney, the Republican nominee, claimed that he is a forceful opponent of industrial wind power, and that his Democratic opponent, Mike Cryans, isn't. The facts, however, do not support Mr. Kenney's claims.
Mr. Kenney spent 14 years in the state Legislature in Concord, first as a state representative (1994-2002), then as a state senator (2002-2008). His legislative career coincided with the deregulation of the electric industry and a mandate for more renewable energy projects, including industrial wind farms.
Kenney supported each bill to advance these policies, starting with the deregulation of the electric generation industry (Chapter 374-F) in 1996, and in subsequent measures to relax the siting and oversight requirements for large-scale renewable energy projects.
In 1998, for example, Kenney supported bills that exempted wholesale electric generation projects from regulation as public utilities (SB 341) and removed the longstanding prohibition on their exercise of eminent domain (HB 1659). In 2007, Kenney voted in favor of establishing Renewable Energy Portfolios (HB 873) and for streamlining the timelines and procedures to approve wind-energy projects (SB 140).
I do not mean to fault Mr. Kenney for his support of these bills. Most of these measures passed unanimously on voice votes in the House and Senate, demonstrating the bipartisan wave of optimism that surrounded each measure at the time.
But we can't let optimism cloud our common sense. Plainly, Mr. Kenney failed to foresee the negative consequences of his votes, which have now arrived in the form of industrial wind development on our mountaintops and lake shores. The Public Utilities Commission certainly recognized what the Legislature had done in 2007, when it noted in a year-end report:
"In Senate Bill 140, the Legislature took the first step in the process of informed decision making when it identified as a problem the need to upgrade the electric transmission system in northern New Hampshire in order to accommodate the construction of the sizable wind and biomass generating facilities critical to achieving the benefits of HB 873 . . ."
(PUC Background Report to the General Assembly re: Electric Transmission Infrastructure, Dec. 1, 2007, page 44.)
But if Mr. Kenney recognized it, he didn't raise any objection or offer any amendments.
As he campaigns today against "big wind," Mr. Kenney should at least explain to the voters how his votes in the Legislature from 1996-2008 square with his position today, and why he supported, without objection, measures that have led directly and predictably to the situation we now confront.
In contrast, Mike Cryans has never supported wind-generation projects. When it comes to renewable energy, Mike's work as a Grafton County Commissioner has included the opportunity to build a wood-chip energy plant at the Grafton County complex. Unlike industrial wind power, which brings harmful environment and economic impacts, usually at the hands of foreign companies, biomass energy expands economic development at the local level by creating a steady market for local woodsmen and local contractors. The Grafton County biomass plant has produced taxpayer savings in energy costs totaling hundreds of thousands of dollars each year.
New Hampshire's energy future will depend on a reliable supply of renewable power. The question is how to produce this power in a manner consistent with our common interests.
Mr. Kenney spent 14 years in Concord rolling back the State's ability to regulate and oversee large industrial energy projects. Mr. Cryans's work in Grafton County has promoted the generation of cost-effective renewable energy in the local economy.
Rather than rhetoric, the candidates should be judged by their records.
Last Updated on Tuesday, 25 February 2014 10:25
To The Laconia Sun,
If you were to ask the typical voter in District 1 what offices were being filled during this next election, I am pretty sure that many would be hard-pressed to identify the open position of Executive Counselor as one of them.
Every once in a while the man who has filled the office for many years becomes better known by the public than the office itself. This was the case with Councilor Ray Burton. Everyone knew Ray. The office is now vacant and needs to be filled and it needs to be filled by a person with the same qualities of experience and dedication to the office. Mike Cryans is that person.
Mike has both the time, the experience and energy to dedicate himself to the task of doing the people's business as a member of the Executive Council. The issue here is whether or not anyone can fill the big shoe print left by Ray Burton. Ray's family thinks that Mike Cryans is that person and so do his many supporters.
Mike realizes that the New Hampshire Legislature did not do its job when it adjourned last year and left thousands of New Hampshire residents stranded by their lack of action by refusing to set up a health insurance network that would free of flaws. Instead it gave Anthem a free rein to set up a flawed network that mainly benefits the company.
It is hard to believe that Mike's opponent in this race for Executive Counselor would support the extreme right wing agenda by putting the already-stifling cost of medical care on the backs of those who can least afford it.
Mike's reasonable approach to problem solving is right on track with those of former Counselor Ray Burton. His experience of 16 years as a Grafton County Commissioner and his knowledge of the North Country will continue to benefit District 1's residents.
When you are in that voting booth deliberating on who will do the best job for District 1, please, give your consideration and your vote to Mike Cryans.
Last Updated on Monday, 24 February 2014 10:18