Letter Submission

To submit a letter to the editor, please email us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Letters must contain the author's name, hometown (state as well, if not in New Hampshire) and phone number, but the number will not be published. We do not run anonymous letters. Local issues get priority, as do local writers. We encourage writers to keep letters to no more than 400 words, but will accept longer letters to be run on a space-available basis. Letters may be edited for spelling, grammar, punctuation and legal concerns.


Mr. Cracraft has done injustice to trust placed in him by Sun

To The Daily Sun,

As I sit in the local Dunkin' Donuts reading E. Scott Cracraft's recent column posing the question "What Would Jesus Do?" I find myself compelled to answer Mr. Cracraft with some simple truth according to Jesus in some instances, and according to accepted interpretations of Jesus's actions. I agree with Mr. Cracraft that Jesus was a man of integrity, compassion, love and mercy but disagree with some of the assumptions that Mr. Cracraft has managed to graft into the purpose of Jesus's mission. Jesus was not, I would argue, on a mission of "social justice", as Mr. Cracraft seems to imply. The temporary ruthless and oppressive rule of the Roman Empire was not the primary issue.

Throughout the Gospels, Jesus dealt with the issue of reconciliation between God and mankind and even instructed His followers to "give to Caesar what is Caesars". . . .you know the rest. Mr. Cracraft has incorporated a plethora of social issues in his column ranging from immigration to abortion and somehow tied in the so-called "Tea Party" Christians as the self righteous antagonists. Let's all remind ourselves that Jesus also instructed all of us to be careful with "bearing false witness" against one another. It seems that in today's political climate anyone who takes an opposing view is something other than a "worthy opponent" but now is to be vilified for their "hateful and mean-spirited" view. We know who the accuser is, and he is in our midst today.

On the issue of abortion Mr. Cracraft takes the favorite weapon of the pro-abortion clan, the rape victim, in this case a 12-year-old rape victim and insinuates, later in his collective misrepresentations, that there is no room for compassion in the hearts of Evangelical Christians. I am wondering, Mr. Cracraft, what percentage of the thousands of abortions performed here in the U.S., in just the last 12 months, have been the result of rape versus the percentage performed "on demand" under the guise of women's health. Rape is a criminal matter, Mr. Cracraft, and if there are as many rapists running around as there are human beings being aborted, then the prisons need to be severely enlarged.

Legal immigration among nations has always meant to be an orderly process whereby the host nation gets to decide who is eligible to immigrate into their midst. Today's massive immigration challenge here in the U.S. is not the sole responsibility of misguided U.S. policy, but rather the result of decades of unrepentant corruption in the various Latin American governments who have refused to provide the necessary climate for prosperity for their citizens. All that being said, it is clear that the only way to meet the illegal immigration problems that face us must include compassion and wisdom. Today there is an overabundance of our population on food stamps and other subsistence programs and Jesus would definitely instruct us to meet the needs of those in need as He said "the poor will always be with you". But He never implied that we should support such a large segment of the general population with programs that drain our treasury at both the national and state levels. Somehow, we are caught up in a whirlwind of "free stuff" and anyone who offers an opposing view is shouted down as "mean-spirited."

Mr. Cracraft has, in my opinion, done an injustice to the trust given to him by The Laconia Daily Sun and especially the citizens who read the columns, in his failure to write a well thought-out article, in this case, that could lead to productive discourse among persons who express deep concern for the problems confronting us today. Instead he has chosen, apparently with editorial approval, to continue the business of inflammatory rhetoric that only furthers the divide among the citizenry.

I am not writing this letter in defense of the Christian worldview but merely to point out that the type of misleading rhetoric that Mr. Cracraft is dispensing in his column is inaccurate and unproductive. Hopefully someone at The Daily Sun will instruct Mr. Cracraft on the merits of insightful editorializing. Or maybe he can take a course at the community college up the street and get a better grade than "F," which he earned with his latest column.

Joe Higgins

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 288

Almost every mass shooting has been in a 'gun-free' zone

To The Daily Sun,

The areas with the most gun laws are the safest? Then Chicago should be safest place in America. Instead, it is the deadliest.

On a recent weekend, 48 people were shot.

Vermont has the fewest gun restrictions and is the safest state. Their crackpot senator says if he is elected president, he will go after guns. New Hampshire is the second safest state, I believe, and our governor vetoed a lessening of gun restrictions bill that passed in 38 states. In every one, crime dropped.

They have tried everything: banning assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, marking bullets, restricting imports, not allowing private sales, taxing sales, not allowing gun stores, registration, gun buy-backs, waiting periods, background checks, closing shooting ranges — calling all of it gun "safety", not gun "control". 

If you are a vet collecting benefits, or on Social Security, and have a third-party handling your affairs, they assume you are incompetent and will come for any guns you own. Under Obamacare, doctors ask if there is a gun in your home.

Every mass shooting, with one exception, has been in a gun-free zone. We need more of those.

None of these schemes have lowered crime and made us safer. Why do they persist, you ask? Because it is not about crime and safety. It's about disarming the citizenry. Are you serious? You bet i am. It's about freedom and they're taking it away, little by little. Join the N.R.A. today. Do it for the children.

Arnold Dunn


  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 565