gunstock

Letter Submission

To submit a letter to the editor, please email us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Letters must contain the author's name, hometown (state as well, if not in New Hampshire) and phone number, but the number will not be published. We do not run anonymous letters. Local issues get priority, as do local writers. We encourage writers to keep letters to no more than 400 words, but will accept longer letters to be run on a space-available basis. Editors reserve the right to edit letters for spelling, grammar, punctuation, excessive length and unsuitable content.

 

Mrs. Clinton opposed to cut-off date for woman's 'right to choose'

To The Daily Sun,

In reference to Mr. Vervaeke's letter to refute Mr. Mitchell's letter:

Mr. Vervaeke "you may not have a womb; but I trust you have "SPERM." Women's issues where Roe v Wade is concerned is with men also. You, as a man, have taken a back seat to reproduction. Is that what you want? Do you wish to negate your responsibilities of fatherhood.

I think the women's/feminist movement has emasculated you. The only way in which a woman gets pregnant is through the seed or sperm of a man. Do you agree?

When the old farts of feminism, who were well passed the age of childbearing and well educated, made a catastrophic blunder by eliminating men from the reproduction process, the esteem of women was deleted and it left the reproduction process to young and uneducated women; men became irrelevant and not responsible for planting the seed of fatherhood. Now, if a girl gets pregnant, have an abortion. This is not right, no matter how you look at it.

I want it known that I'm not a religious fanatic as you elicited in your letter to Mr. Mitchell, but a Christian.

Mr. Mitchell was correct, Mrs. Clinton, states that she is opposed to federal legislation stipulating a cut-off date for a "woman's right to choose." My wording would be "termination of life." I know you go on to Mrs. Clinton's feelings, emotions and thoughts on the subject, but LAW does not equate those perceptions.

Rosemary Mellon

Tiilton

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 390

Vervaeke letter was graceless; it offered nothing constructive

To The Daily Sun,

On Friday, Sept. 2, The Daily Sun saw fit to publish a letter on abortion from one Alan Vervaeke of Gilford. The Vervaeke letter was intended as a response to earlier publication of one of Henry Mitchell's periodic pleas for pregnant women to choose giving birth over termination. According to Vervaeke, Mitchell's pro-life advocacy can only be based upon "some nonsense (Mitchell) heard." Or Mitchell is "simply spouting deliberate nonsense." Whichever the case, Mitchell is denounced as "either a fool or a liar."

To begin with the obvious, abortion is a complex, emotionally-fraught issue on which Americans are in sharp disagreement. Millions, both male and female, hold fervent pro-life views. Other millions are equally strong pro-choice proponents. Resolution of abortion-related questions is therefore challenging, requiring the reconciliation of the compelling, but often mutually-exclusive, arguments advanced on both sides.

The Vervaeke letter offers nothing constructive regarding this process. It is, rather, a graceless, ad hominem attack on someone who holds an opinion that differs from his, a characteristic sadly prevalent among far too many of The Daily Sun's chronic correspondents, whose ranks Vervaeke has recently joined. The letter is also weak on substance, with its fatuous premise neatly captured in the letter's title: "Until You Grow a Womb, Sir, Leave Women's Issues Where They Belong, with Women." In a democracy, important societal issues — like employment discrimination, immigration policy, human rights, and abortion — are not decided by gender. All Americans have a say in their outcome. Nor does Vervaeke seem aware of the irony of his letter; if only the voices of women are to be heard in the abortion debate, what is he doing shooting his mouth off?

Perhaps in future, Vervaeke, whose letters have almost invariably been shrill and demeaning of others, will find the ability to express his views in a more civilized, respectful manner. But if he cannot, perhaps he will do readers a favor the next time the urge to write comes over him.

Bill Lamb
Meredith

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 279