Letter Submission

To submit a letter to the editor, please email us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Letters must contain the author's name, hometown (state as well, if not in New Hampshire) and phone number, but the number will not be published. We do not run anonymous letters. Local issues get priority, as do local writers. We encourage writers to keep letters to no more than 400 words, but will accept longer letters to be run on a space-available basis. Editors reserve the right to edit letters for spelling, grammar, punctuation, excessive length and unsuitable content.


Right now, plowing of private roads in M'borough matters a lot

To The Daily Sun,

While there has been a fixation on the Carroll County Farm and all its intricacies, I, as a taxpayer, would like to hear you expound in the Moultonborough blog on the issue of private road plowing.

I applaud Selectman Punturieri taking a stand to eliminate Policy 2, although in my opinion he could have been more forceful in the discussion to win over other selectmen. He made excellent points that failed to garner other support. But now let's hear the answers to the following:

1. Will our Board of Selectmen press to schedule a discussion on plowing before the local election? It is important for all of us to understand exactly where each member of the BOS stands on this issue. The BOS decided to wade deep into this situation, so now it is time to show their cards.

2. Where is the opinion from town counsel on this issue? When will the opinion be made public, or is it being purposely held until after the election? If the BOS does not have it, will our selectmen press the town administrator to ensure it is in hand and published as well as discussed by the BOS at a posted meeting — not a work session — before the election? What is the holdup?

3. Will our BOS press hard and do a "deep dive" as to why some residents feel the condition of private road plowing this year seems to be dramatically different, late after storms, and less complete from prior years?

4. Will the BOS aggressively press our legislators for changes, in the next legislative session, to RSA-231:59a under the Emergency Lane statutes to ease the requirements necessary for Emergency Lane designation? If not, why not?

5. Will the BOS make public, on the town website, a full list of all private and town roads? Concerning town roads, will the BOS provide the recorded deed book and page reference where town ownership occurred and will they provide the specific information from town meeting records where town ownership was voted by the legislative body?

Recall Laconia currently has a large issue with this. If the town cannot provide specific legislative votes and deed references, will they declare roads without proper documentation private and stop maintaining them, like Laconia may? Is the BOS in touch with elected officials in Laconia on their similar issues and what remedies are they seeing or seeking? If not, why not?

The BOS certainly have increased the temperature to a slow boil among a large slice of town folks over plowing/sanding as well as private roads policy. This note just scratches the surface on issues that I have on the overall subject. I would have discussed these points at an upcoming BOS meeting on plowing, but the new three-minute rule in Policy 33 eliminates the opportunity for citizens to adequately examine issues such as this. And the three-minute rule at last week's public hearing restricted me from getting into a number of points on Policy 2. In our small town, it is totally unreasonable in a democracy, in my opinion, to have such rigid restrictions on public debate. While the BOS is within its legal rights to limit debate, there is a time and place for everything. This topic does not seem to demand such rigid restrictions on discussion that the BOS has implemented.

It is time for the BOS to go on the record, and this is a good place to start. Right now, plowing of private roads matters a lot. In my humble opinion, the Carroll County farm blueberries, hay, fire wood, crops, etc. and associated profitability analysis being discussed locally in a blog moderated by a current selectman can wait. The snow is falling now.

Frederick Van Magness

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 251

Commissioners have proven to be inept at administering funds

To The Daily Sun,

One reads that the county commissioners have decided to redraft the budget which was due on December 1 to include an additional $136,000 in spending. What is the statutory basis for this request? Why would anyone be inclined to support a new and expanded budget when the commissioners have proven to be so inept in administering funds?

When the 2017 commissioner's budget was agreed upon by a 2 to 1 vote on December 5, it was after a $1,175,000 mistake in the first budget, which was approved on December 2. That first budget was a non-starter once the Department of Revenue Administration discovered the county's mistake. After some trimming by Mr. DeVoy to attempt to bridge the the difference between the December 2 budget and perceived county needs, Mr. Taylor balked, which action produced a tie vote. To secure Mr. Taylor's vote, Mr. DeVoy added two expensive and unnecessary employees. To pay for these additional personnel and to compensate for other unneeded expenses, the two commissioners increased the drawdown on the fund balance by $408,657 The irony of their later complaint of an insufficient fund balance seems lost on them.

Their is waste and inefficiency in finance and administration. Corrections has not skillfully used the additional corrections officers put in place over the past two years If it is felt that more correctional officers should be
put in place then they should be part time officers as the county has the ability to hire up to five more full time equivalent personnel. Some outside agencies absolutely should have their county budgets cut or, in two cases,
eliminated completely.

Dick Burchell
Gilmanton Iron Works


  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 487