MeredithMay2017

Letter Submission

To submit a letter to the editor, please email us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Letters must contain the author's name, hometown (state as well, if not in New Hampshire) and phone number, but the number will not be published. We do not run anonymous letters. Local issues get priority, as do local writers. We encourage writers to keep letters to no more than 400 words, but will accept longer letters to be run on a space-available basis. Editors reserve the right to edit letters for spelling, grammar, punctuation, excessive length and unsuitable content.

 

How come senator's not causing that same damage to public schools?

To The Daily Sun,

Senator Andrew Hosmer continues to set a new records for hypocrisy in his campaign. The state of N.H. pays school districts a set amount for each student in attendance. The student leaves, the payment stops. The senator says he worries about the "damage" to the public school as a result of our state law allowing education scholarships to low and moderate income families.  But Andy has a problem, you see, while N.H. has 10,000 wealthy kids currently attending private schools, four of them have the same last name as his.
So, senator, how is it that your kids aren't causing the same "damage" to the schools when they attend private religious schools? Why aren't your kids causing the exact same reduction of state funding that you say is a valid reason to oppose this scholarship program?
Lastly, your campaign video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2tC5DzCTb5A&feature=youtube_gdata_player ) said you and your wife sent four kids to private school to get "a superior education." My question is, why are your kids entitled to this superior education while other kids, who may not live on Governor's Island, have to stay in their assigned public schools? The commissioner of education said two weeks ago that 72 of our public schools in N.H. are not meeting annual yearly progress. Don't we want ALL kids to have access to that same superior educational opportunity just like your kids have?
Gregory Hill
Northfield

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 386

Why would anyone consider voting for the Queen of Corruption

To The Daily Sun,

This past June-July,"FBI Director James Comey basically delivered a coded message to the American people and the world he said: HILLARY IS GUILTY BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT, CERTAINLY SHOULD NOT BE PRESIDENT AND SHOULD BE BROUGHT TO JUSTICE.

But AG Lynch and Obama made it clear to Comey, IF HE PRESSED FOR AN INDICTMENT, HE WOULD BE TAKING THE DEMOCRAT NOMINEE FOR PRESIDENT OUT OF THE ELECTION . . . IF HE THEN FAILED TO GET A CONVICTION, HE WOULD BE FACING CHARGES OF TAMPERING WITH AND CHANGING THE OUTCOME OF A FEDERAL ELECTION . . . AND HE WOULD BE FACING THE REST OF HIS LIFE IN PRISON.

Now you know why he presented his case the way he did and why it was so obvious he was reluctant to not press for indictment.

It is beyond me of why anyone would vote for the Queen of Corruption after knowing very well that the U.S. is not a banana republic and the Clintons do not feel that our Constitution and judicial system apply to them. Perhaps Hillarys first executive order will be to change the last words in the pledge to read, "with liberty and justice for some."

If and when Hillary is finally brought to justice for compromising our national security by displaying classified, secret, NATO-secret and top secret information on unsecured servers, perhaps she can ask Martha Stewart for tips on how she can stylize her ankle bracelet to her tasteless pant-suits.

Eric T. Rottenecker
Bristol.

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 184