A+ A A-

Lack of maintenance of the Hathaway House was a human failure

To The Daily Sun,

This letter is in response to a letter written by Jessica Alward, which appeared in the Nov. 4 edition of The Daily Sun.

It is a little-known fact that the Hathaway House was deemed eligible for the National Register of Historic Places just a few weeks before its demolition. In order for a property to become eligible for the National Register, an extensive survey must be compiled detailing the history of the property, and it must be proven that the property has historical significance. The survey prepared on the Hathaway House was conducted by an expert in the field of history and preservation. Their findings found that the property was historically significant in two of the five categories that prove significance and was a surviving, rare example of domestic architecture in the area.

It is true that the exterior of the Hathaway House was in disrepair. However, the lack of maintenance was a human failure, not the failure of the building. Prior to its demolition several individuals were allowed to tour the interior of the house. They found it to be in pristine condition with original features dating back to the 1800s, and a hand-painted mural that filled one of the walls.

A plan had been devised to move the Hathaway House from Union Avenue to a nearby lot without using taxpayers' dollars. The relocation included the restoration of the exterior of the house and interior space being utilized as a museum and also rental space for new or existing businesses that may have wanted a unique and historical place in which to locate their establishments. The plan was two-fold and offered a positive solution for both sides: the area where it once stood would have been cleared for commercial space, and a significant piece of Laconia's history would have been preserved.

Laconia would do well to carefully study successful, prosperous communities, such as Boston, Portsmouth, and Meredith. These communities have done an impressive job of preserving and using their historical buildings for the benefit of today's businesses and for the community in general. They are also the communities that people to flock to because of their rich cultural environment — which includes the careful preservation of their history.

Carol Anderson


Last Updated on Wednesday, 05 November 2014 10:34

Hits: 230

Did voters understand amendments affected all elected officials?

To The Daily Sun,

Just because the Laconia Mayor, editor/president, owner of the Laconia Daily Sun says it's so, don't make it so. All the Charter Amendments passed by an overwhelming margin. However, did the voters believe it was simple housekeeping to eliminate the non-partisan primary?

How many voters knew, in-depth, that each impacted all elected officials.

ARTICLE II consists of 11 sections. Of the 11, seven amendments were on the municipal ballot. Amendment 1 related to Section 2:03, Amendment 2 related to Section 2:07, Amendments 3 related to Section 2:06, Amendment 4 related to Section 2:06 Amendment 5 related to Section 2:06 Amendment 6 related to Section 2:06 and Amendment 7 related to Section 2:10

Clearly, Amendment 6 "ARTICLE II Section 2:06 to require a minimum number of 35 write-in votes be received to declare any write-in primary candidates as nominated for the municipal election and to declare any write-in regular election candidate as elect for all offices" was the hot topic.

It can never be ascertained that voters we misled by articles printed in The Laconia Daily Sun. As the result of passage of all seven amendments, the Police Commission and School Board are specifically affected:

"All members of the Board of Education shall be nominated and elected in accordance with the Nonpartisan election procedures set forth in Article II of this Charter. (Amended by referendum 11-4-2003, 1,324 yes, 423 no)"

"All members of the Police Commission shall be nominated and elected in accordance With the nonpartisan election procedures set forth in Article II of this Charter. (Amended by referendum 11-4-2003, 1,341 yes, 407 no)"

Even the ward officials are impacted by all of these amendments. All elected official come under Article II and are automatically impacted by the 35 vote minimum.

The amendments were not simple housekeeping. They include a long list of financial implications regarding recounts which disallow taking a picture of a ballot after they become public by the opening of all sealed ballots. The Right-to-Know protects all ballots cast and counted but fails to exempt unidentifiable ballots during a recount. Once members of the recount committee view all the ballots they are a public record.

What happen to wards that ran out of municipal ballots?

Thomas A. Tardif


Last Updated on Wednesday, 05 November 2014 10:30

Hits: 292

Some N.H. communities are claiming right to self government

To The Daily Sun,

I just exercised my right to vote (Tuesday) and couldn't help wondering if I had wasted my time. It is very easy to get discouraged with those that are supposed to represent us. It seems they just keep going behind our backs doing favors for corporate lobbyists that are paid to spend their time pushing for more regulations that are supposedly meant to protect you and me. I feel the only ones we need protecting from are the corporate lobbyists. Their regulations are not protecting us. Corporate crafted regulations legalize any damages to communities, people, and our local ecosystems, while at the same time take away the rights of community members to say "No" to harmful activities.

Our rights are inherent and unalienable (Articles 2 and 4 of the N.H. State Constitution) — we have them because we were born, not because a piece of paper says we have them. The state and federal constitutions were written to limit the power of government, not the power of the people. Who is supposed to decide what power is granted to the government? You and me — We the People!

Consider the first part (Bill of Rights) of our state Constitution, Article 1 says that all government of right originates from the people, and is founded in consent. The power to govern starts with our local governing structure, up to the state, and then to the federal; wherein they govern according to our constitutions, not illegitimate court rulings — at least that is how it should be.

The system has been turned upside down so that corporate power wields federal policy dictating to the states what they can and cannot do, who then in turn dictate to the local government (municipalities) what they can and cannot do, who then in turn dictate to we the people what we can and cannot do. This will not change without communities, made up of people, standing up for the rights we were born with. Exercising the right to local self-government is a first step to take back what has always been ours to begin with.

How do we exercise local self-government? We do so by reforming the old, or establishing a new government (Part first, Article 10 of our state constitution) when the current government denies rights. Alexandria, Barnstead, Barrington, Danbury, Easton, Grafton, Hebron, Nottingham, Plymouth, Sugar Hill, and Thornton are communities in New Hampshire that have begun to exercise their right to local self-government by pursuing a Community Bill of Rights Ordinance (RBO). The RBO protects the health, safety and welfare of residents and their ecosystems, elevates community rights above claimed rights of corporations, and secures the right to exercise local lawmaking free from state pre-emption when the state denies rights.

The people's right of local, community self-government is the right to a system of government within the local community that is controlled by citizens to secure and protect the civil and political rights of every person in the community, and makes real the promise of local control to deny interference by powers that would infringe upon those rights.

If you would like to learn more about your Right to Local, Community Self-Government, please contact Michelle at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. .

Michelle Sanborn


Last Updated on Wednesday, 05 November 2014 10:26

Hits: 160

Let's build safe jail that doesn't require many new employees

To The Daily Sun,

The following is an open letter to the new Bellknap County Commission and each one will be sent a copy:
Recidivism and Rehabilitation:
Despite the many different views on the success or failure of rehabilitation programs in the prisons, the extreme cost to the taxpayers for many programs must be considered, as well as the type of programs best suited to fit smaller budgets. What works in one state or city or town may not be the answer for another. Later in this piece I will offer a few suggestions knowing there are many more out there, and all should be considered.
A decade or so ago, with prison reforms and rehabilitation programs in place, the U.S. prison population went from 150,000 to 2.3 million today. This is 1/4 of world's prison population. 80 percent of the 2.3 million are for non-violent offenses, often drug related crimes.*
Today the U.S. spends more than $80 billion a year on its criminal justice system. New York, California and Florida spend more on keeping people in prison than they do on higher education. For example, in California it costs $45,000.00 a year to keep a prisoner in jail, while it only costs $15,000.00 to send a person to the State University System.*
To make matters worse, the overall recidivism rate in the U.S. is around 67 percent.*
(*These facts from James Jiler "Solutions" dated 6/21/13.)
We should consider the number and types of cases that are committed to the system. Nonviolent crimes must be looked at with probation sentences with mandatory rehab programs during probation, and again, rehab programs for inmates while in prison, rather than extending their time after sentence is done.
Other suggestions have been learning job skills while incarcerated, and one thing that we here in Belknap County could do is gardening and farming. This is something we did for years, and the food for the prison and county nursing home could easily be raised on the property or the state prison property. The working out-of-doors is beneficial to health and proper diets which in itself is a rehab tool. This helps prisoners and at same time cuts some of the costs. We had prisoners on work programs outside the jail that aided the county's cities and towns with road work, and park duties, thus saving cities and towns some money. This program could be brought back and expanded even more. At the same time doing a good day's work rather than sitting all day in a cell or looking at TV gives a person self-esteem and a feeling of doing something good. Positive thoughts of one's self are far more beneficial to future thoughts and behavior than the negative ones gotten by lack of physical exercise and exercises the mind as well.
Nonviolent prisoners who receive probation rather than jail time might be able to not only do mandatory rehab programs but participate in vo-tech programs if qualified. The number of beds needed would be fewer if they were on probation.
The other problem is the great number of mentally ill persons being imprisoned rather than in mental health facilities or supervision. The county and state should be allocating funding and spaces for these people. Rehab programs in prisons won't cure the mentally ill. There is apparently federal money in the pipeline and the county should be working to see the state get their share and let it trickle down to the local level.
The point is, there are as many solutions out there as there are problems. Throwing money at it hasn't proven to be the panacea to what is successful. Don't forget that after prisoners are released, the communities to which they return will still be on the hook for most of them for housing, food stamps, and welfare. So, the money drain never stops and the numbers from U.S. News (4/22/14) show that 67.8 percent are arrested within three years of release and 76.7 percent of that number, within five years . Of the 76.6 percent, more than one third are arrested in the first six months of release and more than half by the end of first year are sent back to prison despite the rehabilitation programs. A PEW study notes that despite new programs there is only marginal improvement in recidivism rate even though spending increased to $80 billion from $30 billion a decade ago.
I am asking the new commission to consider all of the above as well as many other ideas that are floated and do what is best for both the prison system and its inmates as well as for the people and taxpayers of the county. If the budget is too high, it will mean ALL communities in the county will pay above what they can afford and that means cutting roads, schools, police and fire departments.
There will be other points of view on this and they deserve consideration as well, but this is one side based on facts that makes a convincing point. Let's get on with it and rebuild a safe and functional Prison with programs that don't require multiple new employees.
Brenda Baer,

Councilor Ward 4


Last Updated on Wednesday, 05 November 2014 08:47

Hits: 243

They stuck a glue-backed Election Day Notice on my front door

To The Daily Sun,

Just thought that I would tell you what happened when I tried to take an Election Day Notice off of my front door that was left for me yesterday... it was a notice to "remind me to vote.".... after 20 minutes and a half a bottle of Goo Gone, I finally got it off at 7:30 this morning.

These political people should not be doing this and defacing private property. I am not the only one that this has happened to. I did place a complaint over the phone this morning, but of course got a recording. Maybe they should be be the ones to remove and clean up any mess that they leave behind from now on.

This is unacceptable.

Carrie Lennon

Last Updated on Wednesday, 05 November 2014 08:42

Hits: 384

The Laconia Daily Sun - All Rights Reserved
Privacy Policy
Powered by BENN a division of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette