Letter Submission

To submit a letter to the editor, please email us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Letters must contain the author's name, hometown (state as well, if not in New Hampshire) and phone number, but the number will not be published. We do not run anonymous letters. Local issues get priority, as do local writers. We encourage writers to keep letters to no more than 400 words, but will accept longer letters to be run on a space-available basis. Editors reserve the right to edit letters for spelling, grammar, punctuation, excessive length and unsuitable content.

 

E. Scot Cracraft - Why, really, can't Johnny read?

For years, there have been conservative writers to The Sun who do not like teachers or professors and blame all the problems in American education on the people who deliver the “final product.” Many just do not like paying taxes for education but see teachers as greedy and self-serving!

This is not surprising. As the bottom link of the “chain of command” in education, teachers make easy targets for conservative writers and politicians. This actually began during the Reagan administration when there was a popular slogan, “those who can do and those who can’t teach.” It was also during that time that one of the first books about the growing crisis in American education came out with the title: Why Can’t Johnny Read?

This writer always thought it was a good question. But what are the real reasons Johnny cannot read? Of course, the first ones that people want to blame are Johnny’s teachers and perhaps one or more of his teacher are incompetent — but that does not make the majority of teachers incompetent. What about the administrators at Johnny’s school? What about the person who developed Johnny’s curriculum? Was it a school where athletics were so important that teachers let Johnny slide under pressure from coaches and principles? What about the school board, who, under pressure from taxpayers, cut funding for remedial reading programs?

Or, God forbid, could it be Johnny’s parents? Do they value education or teach their kids that ignorance is as good as the teacher’s knowledge? Did they have books at home and read to Johnny when he was little. Did they raise Johnny thinking their son could do no wrong and threaten to sue the school if the school thinks otherwise? Or, could Johnny himself just be a bit lazy and entitled?

Were Johnny’s mom and dad also the type of parents who whined and complained whenever they did not agree with the curriculum or with some subject like rational, comprehensive sex education? Did they have to be ejected from a school board meeting because Johnny really WAS reading but mom and dad objected to the books he was reading?

But it is more fun and much easier to blame it all on the teacher. Writers to The Sun have condemned teachers’ unions and accused teachers of not caring about the students. That is a blatant lie. Most teachers do care about their students and their success. The reason teachers have become unionized is that it was the only way to ensure fair treatment. For the degree of education teachers have as well as the extra responsibilities they take on, they are among the lowest paid of the profession. If it weren’t for teachers’ unions, they might not get anything close to fair compensation. And, their jobs would be at the mercy of a principal who might be under pressure to give the job to a relative.

At the college level, professors are under real assault by conservatives if conservatives do not agree with the professor’s politics. They whine about “tenured academic radicals” and want them fired (while saying nothing about tenured academics.)

Actually, If they bothered to read up on the subject, full-time positions, let alone tenured ones, are becoming rarer and rarer as college administrators replace full-time faculty with adjuncts, some of whom actually qualify for food stamps. The pay hikes are going to administrators (although there are a few cases where college football coaches make more than the college president!).
This all is part of an agenda: many of these same conservatives want to defund public education to the point where it cannot do anything but fail so they can privatize even though public education has made our country great. Our current secretary of education is one of these conservatives.

(Scott Cracraft is a citizen, a taxpayer, a veteran and resides in Gilford)

  • Written by Edward Engler
  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 518

Harrold French is too extreme to represent us well in the N.H. Senate

To The Daily Sun,

State Sen. Harold French is too extreme for our state. I’ve been watching this state senator since he was elected, and it’s clear that he does not stand with women. During a recent Senate budget session there was an amendment introduced that only the most extreme members of the GOP supported. The amendment would have completely defunded Planned Parenthood of all services they provide, including cancer screenings and STI treatment. The amendment was an underhanded, eleventh-hour surprise attempt to close Planned Parenthood’s doors by blocking state and federal money from going to any New Hampshire health center who offer abortion services, even though abortion procedures are never paid for by taxpayer dollars. Senator French voted for that amendment.

Sixty-three percent of New Hampshire residents approve of the quality, affordable health care that Planned Parenthood provides. New Hampshire has some of the nation’s lowest rates for teen pregnancy and STI incidence, and has been recognized for the best maternal health outcomes in the country. With extreme politicians attacking health care at a state and federal level, we risk this progress coming undone.

Sen. French doesn’t support the 11,000 patients (women AND men) who depend on Planned Parenthood for services — birth control, STI screenings and treatment, well-woman care, and cancer screenings.

His extreme votes against women’s health have made it very clear where he stands, and it’s not with the women of New Hampshire. It’s time to stand up for women, Sen. French. Don’t forget, we’re all watching how you vote.

Deborah Clark
Laconia

  • Written by Mike Mortensen
  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 711