Letter Submission

To submit a letter to the editor, please email us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Letters must contain the author's name, hometown (state as well, if not in New Hampshire) and phone number, but the number will not be published. We do not run anonymous letters. Local issues get priority, as do local writers. We encourage writers to keep letters to no more than 400 words, but will accept longer letters to be run on a space-available basis. Editors reserve the right to edit letters for spelling, grammar, punctuation, excessive length and unsuitable content.

 

Holy Grail owners: Please give our restaurant a second chance

To The Daily Sun,

As sole owners of the Holy Grail Restaurant in Epping, voted "Best Irish Pub in NH" for the past seven years in a row, we had promised you a premier restaurant located at 12 Veterans Square, Laconia in the old Evangelical Baptist Church. We had promised you the same great food, stunning atmosphere and exceptional service that we are so very proud of at our Epping location. We sincerely apologize to all of you from the bottom of our hearts that we were not able to live up to our promise and ask you for a second chance. We would also like to thank those of you who have continued to support us consistently over the past year and a half.

Our food is prepared every day from scratch using high quality ingredients, we have 32 specialty draft lines, the most in the Lakes Region and have created a beautiful, cozy atmosphere inside one of the oldest historic churches in the State of NH.

To support the local community, we have partnered up with many local businesses and organizations, including Lakes Region Chamber of Commerce, Laconia Fire Department, Altrusa of Meredith, Bank of New Hampshire, Woodshed Roasting Co., Sweet to Eat Cheesecakes, Laconia Village Bakery and many others.

We have offered our food, services, gift card donations and discounts for many of the local charities, churches and fundraising drives to help support our local charities, churches and fundraising events. We want to play a part in the thriving of the Laconia Downtown and we support the City's effort to breathe new life into this area.

Again, we are asking that you please give us a second chance or try us for the first time.

David and Maureen Kennedy

Holy Grail of the Lakes

Laconia

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 624

‘Right to Work’ is really the right to freeload; weakens unions

To The Daily Sun,
One of the first items on the current General Court’s list is to determine whether or not New Hampshire should have a Right to Work. This writer is against RTW. The title of this act is a misnomer. As one reads this act, there is no statement of any kind that discusses a person’s actual “right to work.”
One assumes by its title that work is a given right in this state. This would mean anyone could claim they have a right to be governor of this state; the governor would no longer be an elected position. Can one imagine some 100,000 governors of this state? But the title says we “have a right to work.”
Efficiency is the hallmark of collective bargaining. We simply cannot negotiate two groups of employees, union member or not. This would add an administrative nightmare to the bargaining process. The contents of this act actually means the “THE RIGHT TO FREELOAD,” a concept developed in a U.S. Steel newsletter. RTW means everyone can get their benefits negotiated for free. This act does NOT indicate anything related to a right to work.
This act attempts to weaken unions and destroy the rights of workers. The act does not provide for the benefits, wages, pensions, as well as health benefits for the hard-working workers/employees and their families. The purpose of the fair share contributions is sharing the costs associated with negotiations. One can then exercise their option to become a full member of the union to enjoy the multiple benefits full membership provides. No one is forced to become a member of the union! The union works hard to ensure its clients receive the best quality wages, benefits, and ensure worker safety (both physical and mental) in the workplace, as well as defend clients when their rights have been compromised.
All employees and workers of the State of New Hampshire, along with their respective supervisors that are covered by fair share to receive essential benefits, protect worker’s rights; to conserve their health, safety, and well being, in and outside the work place, and at home.
It is a known fact, that states that already of RTW laws in place do not fare well in their economies as compared to New Hampshire. Higher minimum wage rates show that these impact positively upon the local as well as state wide economies. It is also a known fact that where RTW is not in place, rates of unemployment are much lower than other states such as right here in New Hampshire (which has one of the lowest rates of unemployment in this U.S.). Arguments stating that RTW will improve the economy in this state is false. The reverse occurs.
Unions, in general significantly improved the well being of all workers. Without unions, workers will have a lower quality of life than they enjoy now. Wages would be far less, benefits would not exist. Unions help to promote the economies, not detract from them. Better benefits also draw more applicants for employment as well as a higher caliber of quality workers. Companies that consider relocation here often do not include RTW conditions. Better transportation network, physical conditions, as well as a higher grade of the workforce are what businesses seek. Businesses want a better educated work force. Unionization creates a happier workforce and a better productive environment. A productive workforce improves and not worsens the economy! Unions strengthen, along with the other variables, our economy here and nationwide. Unions also help provide a stronger and stable tax revenue as well.
Bernie Sanders has said we need to strengthen our work force. The 1 percent must provide for as well as reward its workforce that made the 1 percent wealthy. Their responsibility is reward these employees. The unions strengthen that responsibility that results in the better workforce, not worse.
Those who seek this RTW are those are supported by this 1 percent group that thrives on the backs of New Hampshire’s workers today. Our unions work hard to thwart this demeaning of labor. RTW will return our economy back to the feudal era where the rich simply control their labor force with threats, loss of pay, lowering of pay, and not providing for the families of their workforce. Please tell your legislators and senators to not approve this bill. You and your family’s worker’s rights, health, safety, and welfare are at stake.
Robert T. Joseph Jr.
Political Education Member for SEUI/SEA
New Hampton

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 304