To The Daily Sun,
Exactly what will it take to make the dwindling number of Obama admirers see that his constant push for more gun control laws are a major part of his real agenda for additional people control? His administration has plenty of such laws on the books to control every aspect of illegal possession and use of a gun. Just look up Federal Firearms Laws on the net and you will find so many laws there that you will wonder why they are so rarely prosecuted. Obama's former Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanual, takes every opportunity to blame the everyday slaughter in his Chicago streets, on the law abiding citizens, not the gangs and thugs that he chooses not to jail, using existing laws. He would rather push for new laws in an attempt to make his law abiding gun owners the criminals. You can bet the farm that he would pursue these people aggressively if he is successful. This is true in most major cities and most definitely at the national level. Obama would like nothing better that to add to his growing list of attempts to turn us in to a docile flock of sheep more and more dependent on the government. Can anyone still believe anything this chameleon, a proven liar, (think "you can keep your health care policy") when he says that he supports the 2nd Amendment?
Notice that every savage attack on schools could never happen if any existing laws could prevent them. Federal Law 922 (q) restricts firearms within 1,000 feet of a school and another section makes it illegal for a juvenile (a person under age 18) from possession of any handgun. Obviously the school attackers could care less about these laws. The people clamoring for more laws know that they wont make any difference, but callously pursue their agenda anyway. Their real objective is more and more control of the millions of law abiding gun owners, with the eventual registration and confiscation of all of our guns, just refer to Australia and England. While you are at it, check on the effect that this action had on violent crime there
I am a long time member of the NRA and you can tell that they are one of the more effective organizations, in fighting the many attacks on the 2nd Amendment, by the constant vilification of the NRA by the politicians and most of the mainstream Media. If you are a gun owner, or even a supporter of our Constitution, you should belong to the NRA. They need your support in this ongoing battle to preserve our rights and freedom.
Last Updated on Wednesday, 08 January 2014 10:57
Smoking Marlboros is now forbidden in Irish bars in New York City. But buying, selling, and smoking marijuana is legal in Colorado. It doesn't take a weatherman to know which way the wind is blowing.
But where are we going?
One certain result of the legalization of marijuana is that there are going to be more potheads, more dropouts, and more deaths on highways from those high or stoned — and more rehab centers.
Scores of thousands of Coloradans may relish the freedom they have voted for themselves. But the costs will be borne by society and the families of future victims of potheads behind the wheel. So it has been with alcohol. All of us can recall classmates injured and dead in auto accidents, jobs lost by friends, lives destroyed, and families smashed because of booze.
Just as beer opens the door for the young to bourbon, scotch, gin and vodka, marijuana is the gateway drug, the escalator drug, to cocaine and heroin.
And if marijuana sales bring in the revenue Colorado envisions, other states will follow suit, and some state will become the first to decriminalize cocaine.
Undeniably, the cultural revolution is gaining converts and picking up speed. The haste with which some Republicans are deep-sixing the social issues to focus on tax cuts testifies to this.
It was half a century ago that pot first began to replace alcohol as the drug of choice for baby boomers arriving on campuses in 1964. Yet not until the boomers began moving onto Social Security rolls did the first state legalize marijuana for personal enjoyment. Yet, as with same-sex marriage, now legal in 16 or 17 states, the legalization of marijuana appears to be an idea whose time has come.
What does this tell us about our country? America is not only diversifying racially, ethnically and religiously as a result of continuous mass immigration, legal and illegal. We are diversifying, and disuniting morally, culturally, and politically. Not so very long ago, the U.S. government enforced Prohibition, pronounced smoking a menace to the national health, punished gambling as organized crime, and declared a war on drugs.
Now the government has shouldered aside organized crime to take over, tax, and regulate the rackets. At federal, state and local levels, the government rakes off vast revenues from taxes on booze, bars, cigarettes, casinos and, coming soon, online poker. Government lotteries have crowded out the old numbers racket.
As the poet Alexander Pope wrote three centuries ago:
Vice is a monster of so frightful mien,
As to be hated needs but to be seen;
Yet, seen too oft, familiar with her face,
We first endure, then pity, then embrace.
In the 1965 decision Griswold v. Connecticut, the Warren Court discovered a constitutional right to privacy and overturned a state law prohibiting the sale of contraceptives. Contraceptives are now handed out to high schoolers and a right to contraception has been written into Obamacare.
Abortion and homosexuality used to be scandalous. Now they are constitutional rights and popular social causes, and same-sex marriage is the civil rights cause of the 21st century.
As Justice Antonin Scalia noted, if tradition, religious beliefs, or a community animus against conduct is insufficient to restrict private behavior, upon what legal ground do we stand upon to outlaw polygamy, adult incest, or prostitution?
Yet traditional America is not rolling over and playing dead.
"Abortion rights" face new restrictions in state after state, as a new generation appears more pro-life than its parents.
And as the A&E network discovered when it sought to suspend "Duck Dynasty" patriarch Phil Robertson for his biblical reflections, the silent majority remains faithful to the traditional morality.
And while a libertarianism of the left appears ascendant, there is also a rising and militant libertarianism of the right. We have seen it manifest in the explosion of "stand your ground" and concealed-carry laws, opposition to federal background checks for gun owners, and ferocious resistance to the outlawing of assault rifles and 30-round magazines.
In that Colorado where pot is now legal, state senators have been recalled for insufficient devotion to Second Amendment rights. And there are bubbling secessionist movements in states like Colorado, of folks who would like to separate themselves from places like Denver.
The triumph of the sexual revolution has not been without its casualties, e.g., an endless supply of new HIV/AIDS and STD cases and a national illegitimacy rate of over 40 percent of all births.
And the correlation between that illegitimacy rate and the dropout rate, drug use rate, delinquency rate, crime rate, and incarceration rate is absolute.
Undeniably, the claims of the individual to maximum autonomy and freedom appear triumphant over the claims of community. The clamor of me is prevailing over the claims of us.
But in yielding, America has not only tossed overboard the moral compass that guided us for two centuries. We no longer even agree on what is "True North" anymore.
(Syndicated columnist Pat Buchanan has been a senior advisor to three presidents, twice a candidate for the Republican presidential nomination and the presidential nominee of the Reform Party in 2000. He won the New Hampshire Republican Primary in 1996.)
Last Updated on Wednesday, 31 December 1969 07:00
To The Daily Sun,
New Hampshire Constitution Part II, Article 71 details the responsibilities and powers of county level officials such as a sheriff's department for rural law enforcement, a jail, county attorneys, county treasurers, registrars of probate, and registrars of deeds and may have a nursing home, but is not required to do so. Furthermore, a taxpayer-funded nursing home clearly may not provide rehabilitation service as a source of revenue, competing with the private sector.
Counties have the ability to establish a charter but none has done so. Appropriation laws contain provisions regarding county budget estimates; the commission shall propose annually a county budget to the county convention. A county whose fiscal year is a calendar year January 1st to December 31st, mandates that the commissioners shall deliver or mail to the chairperson of the board of selectmen in each town and the mayor of each city within the county, each member of the county convention and to the secretary of state prior to December 1 annually. The only exception is for counties which are on an optional fiscal year basis, July 1 to June 30 of the following year, which allow the commissioners shall deliver or mail to the chairperson of the board of selectmen in each town and the mayor of each city within the county, each member of the county convention and to the secretary of state prior to June 1.
No county convention shall vote appropriations for the ensuing budget period until 28 days shall have elapsed from the mailing of such recommendations. Appropriations for the first year of each biennium may not be voted until after the first meeting of the county convention.
However, conflicting laws have been established, regarding the counties of Rockingham, Strafford and Hillsborough County? These laws are not applicable to any other county. The laws are exception to December 1, the final date the county commission has to deliver or mail the proposed budget. The exception is prior to January 15. Subsequently, the law governing the annual budget "shall adopt within 90 days delivery" was amended to the beginning of the county's fiscal year if the county operates on a calendar year basis. If the county operates on an optional fiscal year basis pursuant to RSA 31:94-a, then the county convention shall adopt the annual budget not later than September 1, applicable to all 10 counties without exception?
Are the two counties exempted from the new statutory requirement that all county commissions shall deliverer the proposed budget by December 1? Or have the two county commissions lost their 46 day grace period? Moreover, biannually, county commissions have newly elected officers sworn in on Wednesday, January 2, 2013. Two commissions have up to January 15th to have the proposed budget delivered. Therefore, biannually, an outgoing commission need not take any action regarding the budget leaving the responsibility of the newly sworn commission to propose the annual budget for the ensuing fiscal year. Such discretion is not an option to eight commissions regarding the March 31 deadline budget vote or default. The counties still are unable to vote prior to February 12th but are bound by the 90 day deadline. Hillsborough County (RSA 24:13-c) reads like a county charter but is simply law.
The 2014 Legislature has three proposed bills assigned to the Municipal and County Government Committee professed as only applicable to Belknap County. The first question that should be asked is how can the Legislature control what another county's local form of government will be that is not optional for all counties? Why would a county with only 18 votes ever put its county's destiny in the hands of 424 N.H. representatives who have a vested interest in laws which cannot be discriminatory in the constitutional application of a bill of rights? What if one of these counties has a TAX CAP which they want imposed on another or all counties? Can any one of the county convention impose a tax C\cap which must be complied with by the commission regarding a proposed budget? The super majority can amend such proposed legislation so that one or more amendments regarding the "intent/application of all laws involved such as but not limited to any subsection of RSA 24 and 28.
— House Bill 1120 - Amend RSA 24 by inserting 24:13-d. This bill establishes a procedure for appropriations voted by the county convention and transfers of appropriations in the budget for Belknap County.
— House Bill 1370 - This bill requires the executive committee of a county convention to contain a member of a minority party and allows the convention of any county to hire a delegation coordinator. The bill also prescribes the format of the county budget for the purpose of appropriations and transfers.
— House Bill 1373 - This bill establishes requirements for the transfer of appropriations made by the Belknap county budget as adopted by the county convention. The bill also clarifies the obligation to pay the legal expenses of the county convention and county officer and employees acting within the scope of official duty.
County government is not a one man one vote form of government such as town meeting, majority rule. Counties have no specific legal options regarding forms of local government when adopting a county charter. The ex-officio representatives, who form a county convention, are uncontrolled sub-committees of the state Legislature that lack any rules of order or interpretation of a handful of laws.
County charters are governed by RSA 28-A:1- Charter Commission; Petition; Establishment. The commission is governed by RSA 28:1 – 7. A charter commission does not involve the entire 424 members Legislature or Senate approval. A county charter is voted by the residence of a county who shall have the final say, one man one vote. Accordingly, any amendments also fall upon county residence.
What is problematic is that NO COUNTY LOCAL OPTIONS are available to a Charter Commission. Clearly, spot legislation is prohibited similar to spot zoning. The current laws used by three or four counties must be deleted and new law regarding local county options as to the form of government shall be established.
Organization, appropriation and administration governance is not a one model fits all. However, all options shall be available to all 10 counties. The voters of a county may or may not desire to pay for a county commission and a county administrator, all of whom must report to the Executive Committee. Should final county budget be left to the ex-officio legislators or should it be a referendum vote of all the district's voters.
From my research, Hillsborough County law (RSA 24:13-c) is an excellent example of a first step as to what could be A LOCAL COUNTY GOVERNMENT OPTION: Article I - Appropriations; Following budget adoption by the convention, the head of any department, with the approval of the administrator or the commission, but not both, may transfer any line item balance or any portion thereof from one unencumbered line item balance or any portion thereof within his department; The administrator or the commission, but not both, with the approval of the Executive Committee may transfer any unencumbered department's appropriation balance or any portion thereof to from one department to another. (Examples RSA 49-B, 49-C and 48-D)
Thomas A. Tardif
Last Updated on Tuesday, 07 January 2014 10:58
To The Daily Sun,
L.J. Siden asserts, in his response to my letter on racism, "to believe that reverse racism is a bigger problem than racism — that is racism". Perhaps L.J. has not heard of affirmative action, quotas, workplace discrimination laws, etc. Perhaps L.J. is not aware of the current situation in which most blacks are harmed by other blacks. Perhaps L.J. does not realize that white on black crime is so rare that the race hustlers have to invent new names such as "white Hispanics" to perpetuate the cause of victimhood. And for heaven sake, just to bring up the issue of where race is in today's reality, is considered racist by Mr. Siden, who apparently believes this is still the 1950s and 1960s. How are those Arlo Guthrie, Joan Baez, Pete Seeger and Bob Dylan records holding up for you? Okay, full disclosure, I like those folks too, though my view on their politics has changed over the years.
Since I offered lots of references in my last letter to back up my opinions, Siden belatedly offers some "real proof" of "racism" in his letter. Which in Siden's view apparently, can only be white on black. Are you ready? He cites far right-wing racist comments from right-wing sites as clear evidence. I've seen some of them and flag them as offensive to help out the editors of those sites because they do not represent the conservative view in any way. I encourage others to do the same too as they hurt the true conservative cause.
He then mentions the KKK, Neo-Nazi skinheads, Christian Identity, Black Separatists and Neo-Confederates. Yes L.J., I have also checked out the hate map sponsored by the very biased and controversial, Southern Poverty Law Center. Those groups are so on the fringe that one has to spend hours google searching to find any white on black crimes coming from those marginalized groups that have been condemned by all of civil society in a very bipartisan manner. They also do not represent the conservative view. People who belong to groups like those are emotionally unstable, paranoid loons of the type that can be found on both political extremes.
Siden mentions some very racist comments which appeared in Ron Paul's newsletters over two decades ago. Very bad indeed, but have you heard any comments or seen any video of Ron Paul making racist comments? I don't believe so. He is no more racist than Paula Deen is today. If he were, conservatives would have discredited him. Something liberals refused to do with their favorite West Virginia KKK Kleagle buddy, Democrat Robert Byrd. Overuse of the race card has diminished it's power somewhat though using it, however irresponsibly, was still influential enough to devastate Paula Deen.
He then mentions a comment made by Rick Santorum, "I don't make black people any better by giving them other people's money." Apparently, in the world in which Mr Siden lives, asserting that you are against redistribution of wealth is akin to racism. Rick is agreeing with so many black conservatives who are imploring young black people to eschew the liberal, progressive mantra. That being, if you are a poor black person, you just can't make it in this white man's world without the government supporting you cradle to grave. That is the patronizing, self-worth sucking, progressive, liberal twist on traditional racism. Star Parker, Clarence Thomas, Deneen Borelli, Ron Christie, C.L. Bryant, Lloyd Marcus, Erik Rush, Angela McGlowan, Dr. Benjamin Carson, Bill Cosby, Crystal Wright, Ken Blackwell, Charles Payne, Jason Riley, Mychal Massie, Jesse Lee Peterson, Mia Love, Larry Elder, Shelby Steele, Allen West, Tim Scott, Condoleezza Rice, Herman Cain and of course the brilliant Walter Williams and Thomas Sowell all would say that you are dead wrong, in my opinion. They would assert that it is the progressive, elitist, central planning mentality that has created a modern day plantation which has given the gold seal of approval for blacks and to some extent Hispanics, to accept that their lot in life is as victims of a white racist society and they should feel entitled to other people's money. Now to me, that sounds elitist, condescending and racist.
Okay Siden, one more time slowly, so you can grasp the Barack Obama and Oprah Winfrey success stories. Yes, lots and lots of whites voted for Obama, twice. Yes, lots and lots of white folks tuned in to Oprah's show because they adored her. What that is meant to imply in 21st century America is that the vast majority of white people admire other folks for the content of their character and not the color of their skin (sorry, another MLK reference that L.J. thinks I am not allowed to use). Good grief L.J. Siden, that does not mean they are only successful because white folks "allowed" them to be. Man, you gotta shed some of that white guilt because it really seems to have clouded your thinking.
Finally, I am sorry (not really so much) if my calling your opinions "juvenile amateur psychoanalysis" offends you. That is my polite opinion, which is based on your spouting the "twisted logic" of a 1960's Al Sharpton thought process. Al keeps that mindset because he still makes lots of money with it, though it does nothing to help blacks today the way it did decades ago. What's your excuse Mr. Siden? Oh and by the way, I believe "we are having a genuine debate" on this issue of racism. By offering my opinion, I am attempting to discredit yours. You are correct about that. That is what letters to the editor sometimes do. Sorry if you think I am being too harsh or "crass". I think you can handle it and perhaps we should let the readers decide who's opinion has more validity. Whadaya say L.J.?
Last Updated on Tuesday, 07 January 2014 10:36
To The Daily Sun,
Now that it is 2014, here are a few thoughts/questions on Obamacare:
— How many people have paid the premium?
— Who is buying Obamacare? (e.g. old, young, etc?)
— What is the cost of the healthcare.gov website, including repairs?
— When will the website work, front and back?
— In 2009-10, Rep. Shea-Porter and Senator Shaheen told us "we could keep our insurance". Why haven't they apologized for lying to us?
— Senator Mary Landrieu (LA) stated "she was misled when she voted for Obamacare". Were Rep. Shea-Porter and Senator Shaheen misled?
— Rep. Shea-Porter told us that "Obamacare will reduce the deficit". Please explain how?
— Why are Dems running for the hills because of Obamacare?
— Will Reps. Shea-Porter, Kuster and Senator Shaheen run on Obamacare?
— Why was the D.C. insurance commissioner fired for criticizing Obamacare?
— Why did Sen. Shaheen want to delay the Medical Device Tax until after the 2014 election?
— Why is Senator Shaheen joining other Democrats to delay Obamacare?
— Why does Obamacare allow for children to stay on their parent's policy until the age of 26 and military (our veterans) to age 21? Rep. Shea-Porter and Senator Shaheen knew this when they voted for Obamacare.
— Why does the media, newspapers, politicians say that the tax for not having Obamacare is $95? This is not true.
There are other questions but I do not expect Reps. Shea-Porter, Kuster and Senator Shaheen to answer any of them.
Last Updated on Tuesday, 07 January 2014 10:21