To The Daily Sun,
In response to Mr. Lemay's letter of Thursday, May 29, I am shocked at what seems like an otherwise fairly intelligent man saying such embarrassing things about God, the creator. Many of the things he said in response what others had said were total mischaracterizations of the correct and proper points they were making. He apparently doesn't know or doesn't care that over 80 percent of Americans have some belief in God.
Pat Buchanan correctly assigned some of the blame for the decline of Christianity in this country to the elite universities, and for your information, Mr. Lemay, those elite universities had their beginnings while this country was still very young, as purely Christian schools, started by Christians, and attended by students who were Christians, who went there at the urgings of their parents, who were also Christians.
And Mr. Lemay, much of that happened during the time of this great country's founding, during the foundational years leading up to the development of this country becoming the most powerful, but yet the most benevolent country in the history of man. Among other things, the "free" media ("books, movies, magazines") did take a drastic left turn during the 1960s, and did in fact begin "an assault on Christian beliefs and morality." The decline in moral and family values was because of the drug and sex culture, combined with the many young skulls full of mush believed what extreme, far-left college professors, and others who refuse to be held accountable for their behavior, were telling them.
Do you want an example of an extreme, far-left college professor's view? A man named Peter Singer, college professor at Princeton University believes in a woman's right to choose to kill her unborn child. He also believes that right not only extends right up till she gives birth, but he believes that her right to kill her child should extend until the child is two years old. Do you want your child to be taught anything by that man?
Want another example of extreme? When Barack Obama was a state senator in Illinois, he voted for a bill that would allow abortion doctors to end the life of a fetus, even if it survived the abortion. That means that if a woman had an abortion in the third trimester, and the fetus was perfectly formed and alive, and would survive on its own, the doctor can kill it after it has been delivered anyway, without facing consequences for his actions.
But there's more! The bill he voted for came up for a vote not once or twice, but four times. The bill didn't pass on the first three tries, but it finally did pass. That is a disgrace and an outrage, and in a civilized society, should be criminal. If that were your grandchild, how would you like it?
You see, Mr. Lemay, I lived through that tumultuous time. My wife and I raised children during that time. And the only people who blame "Christian beliefs and morality" for becoming agnostic (or even atheistic) because of it, or who vote for extreme far-left office seekers, are themselves "simple-minded". To blame your hatred of God on the behavior of other fallible and sinful human beings, who may or may not be Christians, but are only still trying to find ways to be "fit for the Master," is a cheap cop-out, and totally false!
I would like to now completely turn my attention away from Mr. Lemay's remarks, and others like him, and their warped view of what life is really all about, but who keep insisting that they have all the answers. I would now like to address, kindly and lovingly, those of you who are still searching for answers, like most of the rest of us.
People who insult and sarcastically make fun of the Bible still claim to know what its purpose is. But if you ask them to sum up, even briefly, God's message, they can't do it. And that's because they don't want to do it. They might just learn some things they don't like about themselves, and learn how simple it is for anyone to change their thinking, and become "fit for the Master" themselves. It's not too late for them to learn. It's never too late. But most won't even try.
And that is very sad...
Last Updated on Tuesday, 02 June 2015 09:33
To The Daily Sun,
Don Ewing did not address my rebuttal of his claim that the warming trend we are in now is caused by the same warming trend that brought us out of the Little Ice Age. Instead, he side steps to another denier myth, that climatologists were projecting global cooling. His link shows us how the popular media printed issues about global cooling.
News magazines are not peer reviewed journals. They ambitiously sell a product with sensationalism. This cooling alarmism is a myth and a misrepresentation. It distorts the scientific position in the 1970s, when only a small number of papers were considering global cooling while the rest of climate scientists were predicting warming. Don is committing the fallacies of cherry picking and of magnifying minorities. The cause of the the lull in the warming trend after World War II was not the sun but the sulfate and nitrate aerosols of fossil fuel emissions.
Like the same aerosols of volcanoes, they block incoming solar radiation and have a cooling affect (Like Mt. Pinatubo in 1991, Tambura in 1812, Krakatoa in 1884). This is why there was a cooling period that began after heavy industrial pollution exploded on us after World War II. Rivers were flammable. But that lull ended when we put scrubbers on our plants due to dense smog, increased cardiac and respiratory diseases, and the destructive acid rains.
Free-market alarmists fought that change, too, like they did addressing the ozone. Same ole, same old free market fundamentalism at work. With scrubbers in place, the sooty period ended so more heat began to get through and become trapped once again by the increasing levels of CO2.
Climatologists were not predicting global cooling or an ice age. NASA projected that if we quadrupled sulfate aerosol pollution, we might trigger global cooling on a massive scale. All the research indicated oncoming global warming. We didn't increase aerosol pollution; we put scrubbers in which left CO2 in charge.
Of the many influences upon our planet, global climate has three main drivers; CO2, solar activity, and volcanoes. CO2 is a heat trapping gas, period. Yes, the heat that the CO2 is trapping may be reduced by sulfate aerosols, but CO2 traps heat that gets through, period. For a good refutation of the claim that CO2 isn't correlated with warming see this page.
What Ewing is missing are the external and internal variability factors (forcing) such as solar activity, volcanoes, warming seas, loss of carbon sinks, and the La Niña - El Nino cycle. This is why graphs that cover periods like this one illustrating warming 1880-2009 shows that claim it hasn't warmed since 1998 is false. No matter what the variability factors are, nothing changes the heat trapping nature of CO2.
The same cherry-picking has been done with the year 1934 in the USA. The year 1934 was a very hot year in the United States, but 2014, 2013, 2012, 2006, and 1998 were hotter. Year 1934 was not so hot over the rest of the planet, coming in at 51st hottest. After 2015, it may be 52nd. See Graph 1900-2010.
Climate Change is measured globally and not just in the atmosphere. The cherry picking Ewing does completely ignores the two layers of ocean heat content down to 2,000 meters. The rise has been enormous. The decade of 2001 to 2010 is the hottest decade on record and 13 of the 14 hottest years on record happened in the 21st century. 1998? Very funny!
Ewing's claims of "wild predictions of climate doom: skyrocketing temperatures, droughts, floods, hurricanes, tornadoes, vanishing polar ice caps, etc. that politicians used to try to generate fear and that 'scientists' used to get more grant money."
Nonsense when it comes to most scientists. The deniers are the ones in the pay of the industrialists and their groups like the Petroleum Institute and hack groups with scientific sounding names like Singer's group. Take Wei-Hock Soon, of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics who says its the sun, not CO2 that is causing climate change. Soon has banked more than $1.2 million from the fossil-fuel industry over the last decade while failing to disclose this glaring conflict of interest in most of his scientific papers. Like most of the deniers in the pay of the fossil fuel industry and right-wing economic think tanks, Soon is not a climatologist; he is a liar for hire.
The alarmist calls came from the press and the politicians, not the climate scientists doing the studies. Most reports by the IPCC err on the side of caution, underestimating impacts while pundits, politicians and activists manufacture alarm. The alarmism I see is coming from the free market fundamentalists who wail and gnash their teeth that our way of life and our freedoms are in jeopardy if one takes climate change seriously. It's ideology driven drivel. Don does it. Russ does it. Tony does it. It's drivel.
And what is this about doubling CO2? That is in the future. In the 1880s it was 273 ppm and now its closing in on 400 ppm so where is the doubling? No, Don, the debate on climate change is pretty much settled among climate scientists. Like evolution, it's now the details that are being explored, not the general consensus. What I am attempting to do is combat all the rubbish that free-market fundamentalist groups, fake scientists, and liars for hire have spread. All movement in the polls is away from climate change denial.
You have cited Dr. Philip Lloyd. One author who criticized the ICPP report? Now that carries a lot of weight! Like Fred Singer who was the lone dissenter on acid rain in a major study. Bjorn Lomborg, refuted daily, is another denier who is now at stage 3. These are the stages we see in deniers 1: Deny the problem exists. 2: Deny we're the cause; its natural. 3: Deny it's a problem; we can adapt. Stage 4: Deny we can solve it; it's too big and too costly and that attacks our freedoms. Stage 5: It's too late.
Last Updated on Tuesday, 02 June 2015 09:25
To The Daily Sun,
After several weeks of hiding from the media, Hillary finally came out making a pronouncement. She is now in full support of attacking, vilifying and painting all cops as corrupt racists. Eight years ago she was all for law and order, more cops on the beat but, hey, that's not the current hot button, leftist topic so she, of supposed solid values, jumps right in and panders to the mob mentality in the liberal media.
Folks, remember Fergerson where it all started? Remember "Hands up, don't shoot" and how the liberal media jumped all over that narrative, condemning a police officer on the word of a criminal coming straight from a robbery? I do, and I remember the bombardment by the self-righteous left never ever questioning this criminal's story. Then when it was proven by scientific and witness testimony beyond any reasonable doubt that it was all a lie, those same media sources were as silent as the grave — never an apology to the public for spreading the lie. And it's still going on. Apparently any thug, criminal or gangbanger who happens to be black should be regarded as beyond reproach by police.
Fast forward to Baltimore, where the liberal city government fell right in line with this liberal political correctness nonsense, arrested six cops, and the prosecutor, speaking as though she was part of the mob, virtually promised to send these cops to prison to appease the mobs not for justices sake mind you. And now the police are hanging back letting the liberal administration stew in their own pot and the murder rate is soaring. To bad and the city mayor still thinks it's because of slavery.
This is the idiocy Hillary has hitched her political wagon to. Like she doesn't already have an overflowing abundance of stupid decisions dragging behind her.
One other little matter I'd like to touch on. I read that New York City buses are sporting a new advertisement on their sides. Reportedly it reads: Killing Jews is a religious right that brings us closer to Allah. ( I'm paraphrasing here) Well now, isn't that sweet? So where is the moral outrage from the left? Where is the media and political indignation? Oh I forgot, they save that for Christians and conservatives. Well if that isn't proof of the lefts racist and religious bigotry nothing is. Just last week the left was demonizing the organizer of the draw a cartoon of Mohammed contest, calling it provocative, inciting violence and akin to the "N" word. So what's this crap on the buses except an invitation to commit murder and terrorism? Time I think for the revival of the Jewish Defense League, and why not, sense at no level of our government will they intend to curb the murderous intentions of Muslim extremists? Oh, and did you know that the City of New York refused to allow the advertisements for the draw Muhammad cartoons on their buses? It's only offensive if it comes from the right.
Voters, it will be your children and grandchildren who will become the victims of Muslim extremists aided by the pandering, and appeasing politicians trying to reduce our republic into a Marxist socialist state. (Read Hillary Clinton here.) So think about that as the 2016 elections approach.
Last Updated on Monday, 01 June 2015 05:48
To The Daily Sun,
In respectful response to Bishop Paul W. Blake. The steeple of the Holy Grail Pub points to the sky to signify respect to the Lord. The cross at its top offers hope to all of those who see it and believe in him. In a day and age when we Christians are being asked to remove our religious symbols from all things public, one would think that this beautiful symbol of Christ's gift to us would be revered and respected no matter where it was or is on display.
I, for one, applaud the Holy Grail Pub for keeping this symbol atop of their establishment. Jesus turned water into wine, and fed many with one loaf of bread. Hopefully this breath of fresh air in Laconia will aid in the continued path to economic and social growth for the area. Let the cross of our Lord draw in believers and non-believers alike. The fellowship of all can only be good for the community.
Last Updated on Monday, 01 June 2015 05:42
To The Daily Sun,
In light of Hillary Clinton's views, interest in, and efforts on behalf of small businesses here in New Hampshire and across the country, we are enthusiastically supporting her candidacy for president. To Hillary, small does not mean unimportant. These local merchants and varied business owners are the backbone of our economic system, and we don't have to explain that to her. She will work for a government that encourages their growth and success, while providing a safe work environment. Such a government strengthens families, communities, and our nation.
Most small businesses are family owned and face unique challenges. Hillary understands how important this is, having had experience with her father, Hugh Rodham, in his own small drapery business, where the whole family including Hillary, her mother, and her two brothers helped out.
The businesses on Main Street provide more jobs, more income, and more economic benefit to our economy than does speculation on Wall Street. And further, local businesses can grow and flourish with opportunities that the government can provide through the Export-Import Bank, which guarantees loans to help U.S. businesses export their products.
Hillary is strongly in favor of this funding because it supports 164,000 jobs. Other voices want to kill this funding. We need the leadership of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton at the top of this American government.
Pat & Jan Wood
Last Updated on Monday, 01 June 2015 05:39