Gnomes lives matter

By ROY SANBORN

Probably the number one question people ask me about when selling their home is "What should we do with respect to yard art and ornaments?" That question ranks higher than "What is my home worth?" and "should I take down the family photos?" and there's good reason for it. The very first thing people see when coming to your home is your yard art. And it can make a positive or negative impression. But, some people think that they may have too much yard art and some feel too little. Fortunately, the National Association of Yard Art and Ornaments and your local real estate agent are here to help.

First, here's a little background on NAYAO and some insights into the types of Yard Art and Ornaments. NAYAO is the American chapter of the Gigolos (the Great International Garden Ornament and Lawn Ornament Supervisors) which was founded in early Rome where the focus really was on heavy chiseled garden statuary, columns, urns, sundials and fountains. That's because plastic wasn't invented yet, so there were no pink flamingos. Soon after its establishment, chapters opened in Asia where the focus was on wind chimes, pagodas, Feng Shui and Zen rock gardens. The English had their gardens and ornamental sculpted topiary, fountains and mazes. Not to be outdone, the Germans introduced the porcelain garden gnome in 1841, and a new industry was born.

Now there are different types of yard art and ornaments. I classify them into one of three categories: garden art, lawn ornaments, or gargantuan (redneck) with two subsets of each; a. useful (or functional) or b. useless (nonfunctional and a pain in the butt to move.) Some examples of traditional garden art items are things like gazing balls, bird baths, bird houses, whirligigs, pink flamingos, kinetic sculptures and yes, garden gnomes or other plaster or terracotta figurines. I think you can see that only the bird houses and bird baths are useful and yet only for the birds. It should be noted that garden gnomes are somewhat out of favor today and actually are banned from the prestigious Chelsea Flower Show in England because the organizers said that they detracted from the garden designs. Imagine the gall. Gnome enthusiasts have broken off from the NAYAO and formed the Gnomes Lives Matter movement because they felt the CFS was discriminating against "little people." There is political incorrectness running rampant everywhere. Travelocity has taken up the little guy's cause and is helping bring him back into favor.

The lawn ornaments category is something that has really taken off in America. A lot of the traditional items seen in the garden have escaped from the flower garden at night and taken up residence in green spaces. In fact, you may see these "crossover" ornaments like birdhouses, whirligigs and gazing balls anywhere on the lawn. Americans tend to be very creative and diverse in what they like for yard art. Drive around a bit and you are likely to see carved wooden bears, totem poles, windmills, silhouettes of moose, cowboys or smoking men, metal sculptures, and farm implements like horse-drawn hay rakes, plows and carriages. Yard art can tell you a lot about the owner of the property – you know, like if he is crazy or not. But maybe, he just wants you to think he's crazy. Does an old toilet, bath tub or bedpan filled with flowers make you creative or crazy?

Then you have the gargantuan category, which I really like but I suspect it isn't for everyone. Things like rusty old John Deere or Massey Ferguson Tractors fit into this category. I've seen a few old steam shovels that make really great planters. This could also be classified as redneck yard art. It should be noted that the Gigolos don't recognize this category. These are really hard pieces to move once you get them plunked down where you want them. You kind of have to have the right setting for these as well. You can pull it off in Sanbornton, Gilmanton or Center Harbor, but not so much on Shore Drive in Laconia.

Another gargantuan display that made a lot of news is located down near Houston, Texas, where huge metal sculptures of a T-rex and velociraptor dinosaur stand menacingly on a couples' front lawn in a rather nice upscale neighborhood. Apparently, the home owners association didn't feel dinosaurs are allowed and was causing a big stink about them. I am not sure if they were finally allowed to remain as it was not clear on the internet. You know how news reporters are, only reporting the bad stuff, but if it turns out OK you never find out. For all I know, they could be on their way up to South Down.

There were 1,023 single-family homes on the market as of Aug. 1 in the 12 Lakes Region of New Hampshire communities covered by this report. The average asking price stood at $572,815, but the more telling median price point was $279,900. Half the homes available in the market place were below that amount so there are plenty of affordable options out there to go see! Look for one with some superb garden art or tasteful lawn ornaments.

 

P​lease feel free to visit www.lakesregionhome.com to learn more about the Lakes Region real estate market and comment on this article and others. Data compiled using the NNEREN MLS system as of 8/1/16. ​Roy Sanborn is a sales associate at Four Seasons Sotheby's International Realty and can be reached at 603-677-7012.

  • Category: Columns
  • Hits: 560

Pat Buchanan - The peace candidate

With Democrats howling that Vladimir Putin hacked into and leaked those 19,000 DNC emails to help Trump, the Donald had a brainstorm: maybe the Russians can retrieve Hillary Clinton's lost emails.

Not funny, and close to "treasonous," came the shocked cry.

Trump then told The New York Times that a Russian incursion into Estonia need not trigger a U.S. military response.

Even more shocking. By suggesting the U.S. might not honor its NATO commitment, under Article 5, to fight Russia for Estonia, our foreign policy elites declaimed, Trump has undermined the security architecture that has kept the peace for 65 years.

More interesting, however, was the reaction of Middle America. Or, to be more exact, the nonreaction. Americans seem neither shocked nor horrified. What does this suggest?

Behind the war guarantees America has issued to scores of nations in Europe, the Mideast and Asia since 1949, the bedrock of public support that existed during the Cold War has crumbled.

We got a hint of this in 2013. Barack Obama, claiming his "red line" against any use of poison gas in Syria had been crossed, found he had no public backing for air and missile strikes on the Assad regime.

The country rose up as one and told him to forget it. He did.

We have been at war since 2001. And as one looks on the ruins of Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya and Yemen, and adds up the thousands dead and wounded and trillions sunk and lost, can anyone say our War Party has served us well?

On bringing Estonia into NATO, no Cold War president would have dreamed of issuing so insane a war guarantee.

Eisenhower refused to intervene to save the Hungarian rebels. JFK refused to halt the building of the Berlin Wall. LBJ did nothing to impede the Warsaw Pact's crushing of the Prague Spring. Reagan never considered moving militarily to halt the smashing of Solidarity.

Were all these presidents cringing isolationists?

Rather, they were realists who recognized that, though we prayed the captive nations would one day be free, we were not going to risk a world war, or a nuclear war, to achieve it. Period.

In 1991, President Bush told Ukrainians that any declaration of independence from Moscow would be an act of "suicidal nationalism."

Today, Beltway hawks want to bring Ukraine into NATO. This would mean that America would go to war with Russia, if necessary, to preserve an independence Bush I regarded as "suicidal."

Have we lost our minds?

The first NATO supreme commander, General Eisenhower, said that if U.S. troops were still in Europe in 10 years, NATO would be a failure. In 1961, he urged JFK to start pulling U.S. troops out, lest Europeans become military dependencies of the United States.

Was Ike not right? Even Barack Obama today riffs about the "free riders" on America's defense.

Is it really so outrageous for Trump to ask how long the U.S. is to be responsible for defending rich Europeans who refuse to conscript the soldiers or pay the cost of their own defense, when Eisenhower was asking that same question 55 years ago?

In 1997, geostrategist George Kennan warned that moving NATO into Eastern Europe "would be the most fateful error of American policy in the post-Cold War era." He predicted a fierce nationalistic Russian response.

Was Kennan not right? NATO and Russia are today building up forces in the eastern Baltic where no vital U.S. interests exist, and where we have never fought before — for that very reason.

There is no evidence Russia intends to march into Estonia, and no reason for her to do so. But if she did, how would NATO expel Russian troops without air and missile strikes that would devastate that tiny country?

And if we killed Russians inside Russia, are we confident Moscow would not resort to tactical atomic weapons to prevail? After all, Russia cannot back up any further. We are right in her face.

On this issue Trump seems to be speaking for the silent majority and certainly raising issues that need to be debated.

How long are we to be committed to go to war to defend the tiny Baltic republics against a Russia that could overrun them in 72 hours?

When, if ever, does our obligation end? If it is eternal, is not a clash with a revanchist and anti-American Russia inevitable?

Are U.S. war guarantees in the Baltic republics even credible?

If the Cold War generations of Americans were unwilling to go to war with a nuclear-armed Soviet Union over Hungary and Czechoslovakia, are the millennials ready to fight a war with Russia over Estonia?

Needed now is diplomacy.

The trade-off: Russia ensures the independence of the Baltic republics that she let go. And NATO gets out of Russia's face.

Should Russia dishonor its commitment, economic sanctions are the answer, not another European war.

(Syndicated columnist Pat Buchanan has been a senior advisor to three presidents, twice a candidate for the Republican presidential nomination and the presidential nominee of the Reform Party in 2000. He won the New Hampshire Republican Primary in 1996.)

  • Category: Columns
  • Hits: 556

Bob Meade - What Happened?

Thomas Jefferson said: People get the government they deserve. When he said that, he was telling his fellow citizens that it was up to them to demand the best from their government . . . they, the people, were to be in charge. If they were not, then the government would not be the servant of the people, the people would be the servants of the government.

Jefferson and the founders developed our Constitution, including the Bill of Rights. It requires the people to pay attention, to ensure the government acts in accordance with the duties that are spelled out in it. The powers are divided into Legislative, Executive, and Judicial branches. Laws are to be developed in the Legislative Branch; the House of Representatives and the Senate. Laws that are passed in those bodies are given to the Executive Branch, the president, to either be approved or vetoed. Those that are signed by the president are duly enacted laws and are to be followed. If an affected party believes a law does not comply with the Constitution, that party may challenge the law in the Courts, the Judicial Branch. In some cases those challenges may make their way all the way to the Supreme Judicial Court of the United States for a determination of the law's constitutionality. If the law is found to be unconstitutional, it cannot be enforced. Over time, we have seen erosion in the separation of powers and in the spirit of the Constitution which gave the power to the people. Some examples:

The Legislative Branch responsibilities are covered in Article 1 of the Constitution. In its original form, Section 2 of that Article specified that members of the House of Representatives were to be ". . . chosen every second year by the people of the several states . . .", and Section 3 called for the Senate to be ". . . composed of two Senators from each state, chosen by the legislature thereof . . . ".

A significant change was made to Article 1, Section 3, in 1913, when the 17th Amendment was ratified. That Amendment changed from the appointment of senators by their state legislatures to ". . . elected by the people thereof . . ." That simple change literally upset the proverbial apple cart. No longer did men come forth and volunteer to serve a term or two as a matter of civic duty and then return to their farms or factories. The change ushered in the "professional politician" that we know today. Every one of our longest serving senators came after that amendment was ratified. Twenty five senators have served six terms (36 years) and eight were in office over forty years; Robert Byrd, Daniel Inouye, Strom Thurmond, Ted Kennedy, Carl Hayden, John Stennis, Patrick Leahy (still serving), and Ted Stevens, with Byrd serving more than 50 years.

During that time the Senate became somewhat of a powerful and elite "club" that has avoided and sidestepped many of its duties. For example, although our country has been at war numerous times since World War II, the Congress has not issued a single declaration of war since 1942; they have provided the president with funding necessary to carry out wars but have not shown a willingness to stand and be counted. It is a matter of record that the Congress has also avoided the rigor of hammering out legislation on difficult issues, preferring to let the people bring such issues before the Judicial Branch for resolution, where one swing vote could decide an issue, such as abortion. It is hard to believe that our founders would have envisioned the people accepting such an arrangement. Further, our legislators have allowed departmental "regulations" to have the force of law. In 2013 alone, there were over 80,000 pages of regulations written by unelected federal bureaucrats, most of which were implemented without the Congress even viewing them. That is being ruled by the non-elected!

Another significant change to the Constitution concerned taxes. Article 1, Section 8 provided Congress with the power to lay and collect taxes. Taxes needed to cover the federal budget were levied on the states, in proportion to the state's census. That was changed by the 16th Amendment ,which was also ratified in 1913. It gave Congress the power to " . . . lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several states, and without regard to any census or remuneration." Perhaps more than any other change, this amendment neutered the states and the citizens. With the passage of the 16th Amendment, the states lost their muscle and the people became essentially subservient to the federal government.

Because of these and some other issues, we no longer have the government envisioned by our founders. We have allowed the federal government to usurp our states' rights, and those of the citizenry. Sadly, we now have people running for president who will only make things worse.

Jefferson was right!

(Bob Meade is a Laconia resident.)

  • Category: Columns
  • Hits: 673

The Hog and the Loaf

By Gordon DuBois

This article has nothing to do with eating pulled pork on a loaf of bread. It has everything to do with a bushwhack hike to the summits of two little known mountains (at least for some). Last summer when I hiked the Chippewa trail to the summit of Black Mountain in Benton, New Hampshire, I spied another mountain just to the south of Black Mountain with a long ridge running toward Mount Moosilauke. After looking at my map, I deduced that the mountain was Sugarloaf and the ridge was Hogback. There are three other mountains in New Hampshire that are named Sugarloaf, one near Groveton in the Nash Stream State Forest and the other two in the Twin Mountain area. I have climbed all three peaks, so why not a fourth, Sugarloaf in Benton. However, according to the map, this Sugarloaf is trailless, no trails to the summit. That would mean doing some research and planning to do a bushwhack to reach my goal. I put the plan on hold for a year, until a few weeks ago, when I invited my friend Steve Zimmer to join me in my quest and complete the Sugarloaf four-decker, climbing all four Sugarloaf mountains in New Hampshire.

In researching the hike, I found that at one time there was a trail to the summit as described in an earlier edition of the White Mountain Guide. However, this trail, starting in close proximity to Lime Kiln Road, has been closed for many years and according to trip reports, it is difficult to find. Steve Smith, co-author of the AMC White Mountain Guide and owner of the Mountain Wanderer Book Store in Lincoln cites the classic 1876 guidebook by Moses Sweetser, "The White Mountains: A Handbook for Travelers." "Sugar Loaf ... is a sharp and conspicuous peak of light colored rock, alpine in appearance, and easily recognized from a great distance. Although its height is but 2,565 ft., it will probably be a favorite point of attack when alpine exercise becomes popular in New England, on account of the fascination of its defiant cliffs, the exciting perils of the ascent, and the beautiful view from the summit." Upon reading this post on Steve Smith's trip report, I became even more intrigued with this rather unknown and obscure peak, because of its bold cliffs and outstanding views from the summit.

In discussing my plans with Steve Zimmer, he suggested throwing in another mountain, Jeffers, which is part of this long ridge. I said, "Why not!" On a beautiful warm and clear day, we headed out to western New Hampshire on Route 25. When we arrive in Glencliff we turned onto High St. (Formally Sanatorium Road) and then onto Long Pond Road, a Forest Service road that is sometimes gated. The gate was, fortunately, open and we made our way to a point almost directly east of Mt. Jeffers, where we began our bushwhack, setting the compass at 266 degrees. Steve and I, along with our dogs Skipper and Reuben, who have been hiking buddies for years, set off into the thick forested mountainside.

On our way through the woods, we found beautiful wildflowers as well as a numerous ramps. Ramps, Allium Tricoccum, also known as wild leeks, are native to the eastern North American mountains. They can be found growing in patches in rich, moist, deciduous forests. They are in the Allium family, related to garlic and onions. They have a smooth, pleasant taste of young spring onions with an aroma similar to garlic. They are sought after by many natural food gurus and make a wonderful addition to a salad. In the south, especially in Tennessee and North Carolina, ramps festivals are quite popular.

After pausing to contemplate pulling some ramps to take home for a salad, we moved on, leaving these delicious woodland plants to grow and multiply. Within two hours, we reached the summit of Jeffers Mountain (2,994 ft.) marked by a canister mounted on a tree. We sat for a while and watched several spruce grouse fledglings and their mother hen scurrying around in the brush. The youngsters were learning to fly by fluttering from tree branches above our heads.

After signing our names in the register, we set out for Hogback ridge. We found several old trail markers, which were no more than slash marks on a tree, but these markers disappeared well along the ridge. Our track took us along the ridgeline to several view points, and we could see the long rocky ridge summit of Hogback just ahead. When we climbed to the pinnacle of Hogback, the views were unexpectedly remarkable. We could see well into Vermont across the Connecticut Valley to the west and over to Mt. Moosiluake and Cluff Mountain to the east. Since few people climb Hogback we may have been the first people on the mountain this year.

From Hogback we began our climb to Sugarloaf to our west. As we made our approach we could see Black Mountain with its rock cliffs. We scanned the area around the mountain for any sign of the old limestone quarries that were used to feed the lime kilns, located at the base of Black Mountain. Limestone has been used thousands of years for building construction, sculptures, mortar, glass making, fertilizer, and even in toothpaste. The kilns were part of a very important industry in New Hampshire during the 19th century. The mined limestone was heated in the kilns, and turned into a powdered form. This was then packed into barrels and shipped throughout New England. The two Haverhill kilns were built in 1838 and 1842 and operated profitably until 1888. The woodland surrounding the kilns provided the wood needed to fire the kilns at high temperatures.

Steve and I explored the open rock face summit of Sugarloaf, finding a trail that led down the mountain toward Black Mountain and another that seemed to be the remnants of the old abandoned trail leading out to Lime Kiln Road. After eating our lunch, we packed up and began the bushwhack back to our car. Our route took us through open woods, log clearings and overgrown logging roads. It was clear that this side of the ridge was heavily logged over the past several years. We eventually found a more recent forest road that led us directly back to our cars.

The bushwhack took us about seven hours, walking a total of 6.5 miles, a long slow slog, but well worth the effort. The entire hike was relatively easy as bushwhacks go, and I would encourage anyone who has good map and compass skills and/or is competent in using a GPS to take on the Sugarloaf-Hogback-Jeffers challenge. Sugarloaf can also be approached from the Chippewa Trail that leads to Black Mountain. As Moses Sweetser stated, "Sugarloaf (should be climbed) on account of the fascination of its defiant cliffs, the exciting perils of the ascent, and the beautiful view from the summit."

  • Category: Columns
  • Hits: 595

Michael Barone - What's 'Make Amerian One Again' about?

"Make America One Again." That was the stated theme of the last night of the Republican National Convention. In the welter of analysis of Donald Trump's acceptance speech, few have commented on it, but it's worth taking it seriously.

Liberal commentators have dwelled repeatedly on Trump's "dark" and "dystopian" view of America. Apparently, you're not supposed to think badly of our nation when we have a black Democratic president.

This is mostly just partisan spin. The candidate of the out party invariably takes a dim view of the way things are going. Yes, they usually add more uplift than Trump provided.

But when two-thirds of voters think the nation is not moving in the right direction, pessimism does not go against the grain. You heard similar pessimism, although about different things, in the campaign for the Democratic nomination. Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders depicted the nation as if we were in the seventh and eighth years of a Bush presidency.

Unlike other recent acceptance speeches, Trump's made almost no mention of history, except for a reference to a Lyndon Johnson IRS regulation, and made no attempt to put his candidacy in historical context. There was no mention of Ronald Reagan.

Nevertheless, the theme of "making America one again" is in line with the historical character of the Republican Party, which has always had a central core of people seen as typical Americans but are never by themselves a majority. They must attract others to their cause.

In contrast, the Democratic Party has been a coalition — sometimes fractured, sometimes a majority — of disparate minority groups: white Southerners and big city immigrants in the 19th century, black churchgoers and gentry liberals today.

Hillary Clinton is trying to reassemble the 2012 Obama 51 percent majority by offering something to blacks, something else to Hispanics, another thing to millennials and LGBTQs.

Trump is doing something different. He seeks to appeal to different kinds of people as all being Americans. On Thursday night, Tennessee Rep. Marsha Blackburn, a Mississippi native, quoted an 1861 Abraham Lincoln speech in Cleveland: "If all do not join now to save the good old ship of Union this voyage, nobody will have a chance to pilot her on another voyage."

Thursday night speakers included the Rev. Jerry Falwell and Silicon Valley billionaire Peter Thiel, who proclaimed himself proudly gay, proudly Republican and, most of all, proudly American.

In his acceptance speech Trump promised to protect LGBTQs (he charmed the audience by stumbling over the acronym) from a "hateful foreign ideology" and thanked evangelicals (while admitting that he is far from being one himself) for their support.

The message is that the culture wars are over. As for "who uses which bathroom," the latest cultural brouhaha, Thiel's answer was: "Who cares?"

Other arguments have become stale. Abortion won't be criminalized, but abortions have been rarer and the number of abortion clinics is declining, and not just because of restrictive state laws.

Same-sex marriage has been legalized everywhere by the Supreme Court, saving Republicans from the task of opposing majority opinion. But you don't have to participate (I haven't seen any recent cases of bakers sued for refusing to making wedding cakes for gay couples). This is in line with basic etiquette, which says you can decline a wedding invitation without giving a reason.

The debate over these issues seems stale, and it's not clear that Democrats' efforts to pump up their constituencies' enthusiasm or arouse their fears will work; we'll get some idea in Philadelphia. But it may prove hard to provoke alarm in those who have been mostly winning on these issues.

Democrats have a more target-rich environment in attacking Trump as volatile and unreliable, as presumptive vice-presidential nominee Tim Kaine did Saturday. More difficult will be attempts to present a sunnier alternative to Trump's "dark" narrative.

It's true that, as Barack Obama said Friday, crime is down compared to 30 years ago, and increases in urban homicides may just be, as he said, an "uptick." But Trump's numbers are accurate also. A president who people thought would be something like Martin Luther King has sounded more like Al Sharpton.

It's hard to make the case that things are not really as bad as you think they are, and that sophisticated people realize that terrorist incidents are less common than bathtub accidents, that murders of police are less of a problem than bathroom issues. We'll see how the Democrats do.

(Syndicated columnist Michael Barone is senior political analyst for The Washington Examiner, is a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, a Fox News Channel contributor and co-author of The Almanac of American Politics.)

  • Category: Columns
  • Hits: 621