I don't know enough about a lot of things to know if the deal with Iran is good enough, to know whether Iran will keep to it, to know whether it endangers Israel, to know just about anything except that I can tell when people on TV are working off the same sets of talking points.
In campaigns, we always say that you can't predict all the crises a new administration will face, so you have to look at the character of the individual or individuals who will be making the life and death decisions in the future — based on information you and I won't have. I may not know much about Iran, but I know Wendy Sherman, and I don't know too many people as extraordinary as she is.
Back in the 80s; before she spent decades at State with Warren Christopher and later as Madeleine Albright's counselor; before she was dealing with North Korea and taking heat for it; back when she was she was a top Senate aide, a feminist mover and shaker around town, Wendy, among her many campaign jobs, ran the soft money in the '88 campaign.
You have to be a real oldster in this post-Citizens United world to remember how tricky it used to be to siphon unrestricted donations into a publicly funded (and expenditure-limited) campaign. Every four years, the top election lawyers on both sides would devise new ways to turn the campaign finance rules into Swiss cheese, and the popular route in those days involved party-organized "Victory Committees", running money through certain state parties and various other little tricks that actually seemed fairly aggressive at the time even if they look positively tame now. On the other side, you had everybody and his brother and sister-in-law coming to you for money, everybody you owed or would someday owe in politics telling you that the only way to avoid a landslide in (fill in one of many blanks) was to get some money from the Victory Fund into particular races.
Sometimes they were wrong and sometimes they were right and every interaction was a negotiation that would be held up and compared (and complained about) by almost every recipient — one of those critically important jobs that is almost entirely thankless, where no one will remember when you're right but boy will they be quick to blame you when you're wrong.
So you need someone who is obviously smart and has excellent judgment and can deal with any kind of pressure, including rude and overbearing men (yes, we had some, just a few, in those days); someone who keeps her cool when, with apologies, all the men around her are losing it and blaming it on her.
Someone like Wendy, if there were someone else quite like Wendy.
There's one more skill Wendy needed in those days, one that has served her well since. She was constantly making decisions on the fly, figuring out how far we could or couldn't go. I was the lawyer. She was the moral compass.
Wendy Sherman has as much plain old-fashioned integrity as anyone I have met. Her commitment to public service, not just public service but service to the United States of America, is not something she crows about. It's just who she is.
Her critics will be all over the Iran deal; I'm seeing the same quotes and criticisms everywhere, so the talking points have clearly been prepared. She was not the negotiator of the Clinton 1994 "freeze agreement" but it was her job to sell the plan and she did, and she doesn't back away from it. Says Wendy: "During the Clinton administration, not one ounce of plutonium was added to the North Korean stockpile." She also insists, rightly, it seems to me, that Iran and North Korea present vastly different challenges.
I met some amazing people in politics who went on to do some pretty amazing things. Wendy stands out, and not just for her wonderful white hair. She is exceptionally devoted to our country and possesses a strong sense of honor. Given the need to trust someone in debates like these, I can think of no one more deserving.
(Susan Estrich is a professor of Law and Political Science at the University of Southern California Law Center. A best-selling author, lawyer and politician, as well as a teacher, she first gained national prominence as national campaign manager for Dukakis for President in 1988.)
Last Updated on Thursday, 16 July 2015 06:54
On arrival in La Paz, Pope Francis was presented by Bolivian President Evo Morales with a wooden crucifix carved in the form of a hammer and sickle, the symbol of Lenin, Stalin, Mao and Fidel.
Had Pope John Paul II been handed that crucifix, he might have cracked it over Evo's head. For John Paul II had seen up close what communism did — to his country, his church and his people in 45 years of Bolshevik rule.
On his arrival in the Nicaragua of Daniel Ortega in 1983, Pope John Paul castigated a priest-collaborator who dared to serve that Sandinista Marxist regime as culture minister. And, while in Managua, he warned Catholics they were being threatened by "unacceptable ideological commitments."
Today we have a pope for whom free-market capitalism is the "unacceptable ideological commitment".
As The New York Times reports, Pope Francis does "not just criticize the excesses of capitalism. He compares them to the 'dung of the devil.' He does not simply argue that 'greed for money' is a bad thing. He calls it a 'subtle dictatorship that condemns and enslaves.'"
In South America, Pope Francis "made a historic apology for the crimes of the Roman Catholic Church during the period of Spanish colonialism — even as he called for a global movement against a 'new colonialism' rooted in an inequitable economic order."
"The Argentine pope seemed to be asking for a social revolution."
Now the church has a long tradition of criticizing capitalism, dating back to the encyclical Rerum Novarum in 1891. In "American Church: The Remarkable Rise, Meteoric Fall, and Uncertain Future of Catholicism in America," author Russ Shaw deals with the causes and consequences of what some Catholics contend was a fatal embrace of a heretical "Americanism" in the 19th century.
This pope goes beyond that. His words about capitalism echo what Cold War Catholics said of communism, that it is a tree poisoned at the root that can yield only bad fruit, and, as the Gospel teaches, ought to be cut down and cast into the fire.
What is wrong with the pope's neo-socialist sermonizing?
While capitalism does indeed generate inequalities, freedom, too, produces inequality. For all men and all women are unequal in abilities, energy and opportunities. In a free society, some inevitably succeed, others fail.
For as the Biblical parable teaches, some are given 10 talents, others two, and God judges us on how well we use the talents we were given. The only way to achieve absolute equality is absolute tyranny, the remorseless redistribution of wealth by an all-powerful regime.
The pontiff says the capitalist "idolatry of money" creates "the dictatorship of an impersonal economy lacking a truly human purpose." But it is egalitarianism that has proven to be the road to dictatorship, dictatorships run by egalitarians in the name of the "proletariat".
Free enterprise has brought more millions out of poverty, enabled more billions of people to live longer, freer, healthier and happier lives, and produced more widespread prosperity than any other economic system.
What is the superior system the pope believes we should adopt?
What has Argentina produced but an economically failed state, incompetent socialist rulers, and an occasional Peronista in sunglasses and shiny boots? Is Latin America a fine model?
The pope used the phrase "dung of the devil". Is that not a good description of Karl Marx's "Communist Manifesto" and "Das Kapital"? And is not satanic the precise word to describe the scores of millions of dead that 70 years of Marxist-socialist ideology produced?
The 100 million people of Eastern Europe, the 300 million of the late Soviet Union, the 1.2 billion people in China — are they not better off the further they have moved away from Marxism, and the closer they have moved toward free-market capitalism?
As for the pope's apology for the sins of Spanish Catholicism in Latin America, why does he not speak up for the culture Catholicism helped to create, the eradication of paganism, and the termination of such practices as human sacrifice among the indigenous peoples?
But, then, we Americans are no strangers to "apology tours."
The pope is calling for a "social revolution." But what country, among the 190-plus in the U.N., comes closest to the utopia the pope has in mind? Or does his utopia exist only in the mind?
The pope is saintly man. But he has no special understanding of economic systems or of climate change. He is the Vicar of Christ, of the Savior sent by the Father to teach us what we must believe and how we must live to attain eternal life.
Christ did not come among us to end colonialism, or redistribute wealth, or start a social revolution against the empire of the Caesars.
As he told Pontius Pilate, "My Kingdom is not of this world."
Pope Francis is the infallible custodian of that truths Christ taught. Is that not sufficient, Your Holiness? Why not leave the socialist sermons to Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren?
(Syndicated columnist Pat Buchanan has been a senior advisor to three presidents, twice a candidate for the Republican presidential nomination and the presidential nominee of the Reform Party in 2000. He won the New Hampshire Republican Primary in 1996.)
Last Updated on Wednesday, 31 December 1969 07:00
Since I have been hiking in the Belknap Mountains with friends and family for several years, I became interested in learning more about the trail system and had several questions I needed to answer: Who built he trails, how are they maintained, how did the rock steps get placed, who cleans out the water bars? About 3 years ago I was invited by a close friend and hiking partner, Steve Zimmer, to attend the annual meeting of BRATTS (Belknap Range Trail Tenders). I asked him, "What's BRATTS?" Steve responded, "Let's go and find out."
I attended the gathering of about fifty people at the Gilford Library, all of them there to support the work of BRATTS. At the head table sat Hal Graham, a stocky man who spoke with passion about the trail system and the need for volunteers to build and maintain trails in the Belknap Range. After hearing of their work and the need for trail maintainers I quickly volunteered to sign on as a "trail tender". But I needed to know about this group called BRATTS, as well as Hal, who led the meeting and was known and respected by so many people in the room.
What I have found out over my brief three years with BRATTS is this: BRATTS was formed in 1993, by a small group of volunteers led by Hal Graham whose mission is to construct and maintain the trail system in the Belknap Range Mountains. The organization relies totally on volunteers to do the trail work so that individuals, groups and families can enjoy hiking in this beautiful small mountain range. BRATTS is symbolic of the famous quote by Margaret Mead, "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it's the only thing that ever has." This is the ideal grass roots, community based organization that relies on a small and committed group of people to achieve its mission without a single penny from taxpayers. It interfaces with many other organizations who have ownership of much of the land in the range, such the Daniel Webster Boy Scout Council, the State of New Hampshire, private land owners and Belknap County. Volunteers of all ages, background, gender and skills work together to ensure trails are well maintained. All trail work is done by Best Management Practices under the supervision of The N.H. Division of Forest and Lands and The Gunstock Area. At present there are 21 trails in the range and all of them have trail adopters, whose job is to maintain these trails for public use.
Now to answer my second question, who is this guy Hal Graham? Over the past 3 years this is what I have found out: Hal is a former SEABEE with the U.S. Navy, married to Peggy, who is also active in BRATTS, and they live in Sanbornton. Hal started his training in trail work in 1979 with the Appalachian Mountain Club as the founder of the NH/AMC Chapter Trail Crew. For four years he worked on the AMC trail system in the White Mountains and worked on a variety of trail reconstructions, like the Bridal Path that climbs Mt. Lafayette. I now understand why Hal loves to work on heavy duty trail construction. For many years his trail work with the AMC provided him with the foundation of his work with BRATTS today.
In 1987 Hal, along with a few others formed Trailwrights, www.trailwrights.org, a committed group of hiking enthusiasts who work in Massachusetts, Vermont and of course New Hampshire rebuilding trails and building new ones. It is a unique group in that it is an educational and trail maintenance organization collaborating with other groups such as the Wonalancet Outdoor Club, the Appalachian Trail Conservancy, NH Audubon and many others, including state agencies.
In addition to his love of trail building, Hal along with his wife Peggy are avid and experienced hikers, having been trip leaders for the AMC, hiking throughout the US and climbing the highest summits in most of the continental U.S. In addition Hal mans the Belknap Fire Tower during the summer months. He has stated several times over the course of the last two years that he would like to step down from the President's position of BRATTS, but remain on the Trail Crew (those doing the heavy trail work). Hal is BRATTS and typifies the spirit and soul of the organization. I think he'll be with us a long time and if you see him or any other the trail maintainers doing their work, please give them a huge smile and a few words of appreciation for the work they do in keeping the trails safe and fun to hike.
If you're interested in becoming a member of BRATTS or learning more about the organization go to www.facebook.com/BelknapRangeTrailTenders
BRATTS will also be holding a trail maintenance workshop on Saturday, July 18. If interested you can call 286-3506.
Last Updated on Wednesday, 15 July 2015 06:10
When Mitt Romney's campaign was investigating potential choices to be his 2012 running mate, they gave each prospect a fish-themed code name, such as Lake Fish, Filet-O-Fish, etc. Their name for New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, a tireless self-promoter known for his bloated ego, was Puffer Fish.
The Romneyites determined that the prima donna governor was wholly unqualified to be America's vice president, but the rejection didn't deflate Christie's puffed-up self-esteem one dot, and he has continued to brag, bluster and bully his way into national politics. Having convinced at least himself that he's the can-do, big-idea, forceful leader America needs, the Jersey guv is now offering to be our president and has become No. 14 on the Republican presidential dance card! How exciting is that?
Before accepting, however, you might check with one group of voters who are less than enchanted: the people of New Jersey. With a moribund economy, a state budget mess, a growing pension crisis, the state infrastructure crumbling and his own office caught in a web of scandals, Christie is not faring well with the homefolk, earning a sorry 30 percent approval rating, with most voters saying they dislike "everything about him."
Nationwide, only Donnie Trump is rated lower than Christie by Republican primary voters. But he has found one friend — Maine Gov. Paul LePage has enthusiastically endorsed him! Problem is, LePage is even more insufferable and insolent than Christie, so arrogant and autocratic that he's even alienated fellow Republicans in Maine and is now threatened with impeachment.
Still, if anything, the Puffer Fish's ego is puffier than ever. Asked on Fox News why 65 percent of New Jersey voters say he'd make a poor president and shouldn't run, the vainglorious governor actually said: "They want me to stay. Don't leave to run for president, because we want you to stay."
It's one thing for a politician to say that, but — far scarier — Christie is so out of touch with reality that he actually believes it!
The Big Man from New Jersey entered the race with all the chutzpah and hullaballoo that marked his five and a half years as governor of the Garden State, promising to be a truth-telling leader: "There is one thing you will know for sure," he roared in his announcement speech. "I say what I mean and mean what I say."
Swell, Chris... but when your campaign slogan is "Telling It Like It Is," it would help if you were not infamous in your home state as a stunningly audacious, inveterate liar. Even the editor of Jersey's largest newspaper felt a journalistic duty to warn America about Christie. "Don't believe a word the man says," the editor wrote, pointing not to a few fibs and fabrications, but a lengthy "catalog" of "over-the-top, hair-raising type of lies," including these gems:
— Having assured public employees that their pensions were "sacred" to him, Christie then made cutting their pensions the centerpiece of his first term in office.
— This June, he bragged on national TV that a court had approved those pension cuts — but the court actually ruled them unconstitutional.
— At a recent South Carolina gun rights meeting, Christie crowed that "no new (gun laws) have been made since I've been governor," when in fact he has enacted three gun-control measures.
— After he and his family racked up a $30,000 hotel bill during a luxurious weekend getaway at a Jordanian resort, paid for by the King of Jordan, Christie claimed the junket was not a violation of the state gift ban, for he and the king were personal friends — but he'd only met the king once at a political dinner.
Beware of Christie the compulsive liar. As the newspaper editor bluntly put it: "He's a creep."
(Jim Hightower has been called American's most popular populist. The radio commentator and former Texas Commissioner of Agriculture is author of seven books, including "There's Nothing In the Middle of Road but Yellow Stripes and Dead Armadillos" and his new work, "Swim Against the Current: Even Dead Fish Can Go With The Flow".)
Last Updated on Friday, 10 July 2015 08:07
So, here's the deal. I think every house should have a name. Houses always used to have names because, well, because they didn't have street addresses way back once upon a time. If I said I was going down to 1 Lodge Street you might mistakenly think that I was going down to the Fraternal Order of Elks, but in fact, I would be going to the fabulous Biltmore Estate in Asheville, N.C. which most likely has a few stuffed elks in the humongous game room. Nobody ever refers to this place as 1 Lodge Street.
I like houses with names and I suspect that the owners who actually name their homes must really love them a lot. And a house loved is usually a house that shows well. House names can be descriptive of the place, the style or architecture, the size, and even the owner's personality. And, in real estate, having a name adds a little cache and style to the listing. I've had some homes on the market that had interesting names like Stonybrook Farm, The Farley Garrison House, Temperance Tavern, and Windsong to name a few. These names tell you something or give you a feeling about the property before you even see it.
One of the earliest terms used in house names was "hall." Early halls were homes with just one room where everyone slept, ate, and just tried to survive. Often these were called mead halls. Eventually, rooms were partitioned off to give the lord of the house some privacy and the entry way and corridor retained the name "hall." There was apt to be a large room with a fireplace called the "great hall." That has evolved in to the "great room" of today. Now we think of halls as meeting places, town offices, concert venues, pool rooms, or college dorms down at UNH. Toad Hall is a great name for a house...if you like toads, I guess.
You can tell a lot about the house by the name. Words like "manor, mansion, or estate" when affixed to a name like "Rothschild" will set your expectations pretty high. The words "house" and "place" give you the feeling that either something great happened there or the property has some history attached to it. The term "lodge" can be taken as a sprawling lake house or a tiny shack in the woods. "Camp" could also be taken either way. You can have a camp up in Pittsfield which could be a far cry from one of the Great Camps in the Adirondacks.
In the Lakes Region there are some places that everyone knows by the name and not the address. Castle in the Clouds and Kona Mansion in Moultonborough, Moulton Farms in Meredith, The Lamprey House or Coe House in Center Harbor, and the Benjamin Rowe House in Gilford. But there's not many houses with names until you get down by the lakes.
It seems like lots of lake front property owners are often so excited and happy about being on the water that they just have to call the place something! I wish everyone was like that. These owners love their houses enough to name them. And if their property is for sale that feeling can perhaps impress and stay with the buyers that are looking at it, too. I'd rather market and show the Blue Heron Lodge, Eagle's Nest, Bayside Delight, Quiet Water Camp, Sandy Haven, Sunset Cove Retreat, or Long View Lodge instead of a bland 13 Point Drive or 103 Maple Street any day.
But what about names like Windswept, Mountain View Lodge, or Ridgeline Retreat for those places up on the hill? If you have some acreage you could go with Sunny Slope Farm, Wild Acres Retreat, or Willowgrass Acres (just don't use "Green.") If you have a great place, give it a great name! Get creative and go get a sign made and put it by your entry. It's cheap money and can make an impact and separate you from all those other houses that don't have a caring, loving owner like yourself.
So start thinking and using words like bungalow, cabin, camp, cottage, house, lodge, farm, acres, retreat, haven, respite, refuge, haven, delight, rest, cove, lakeside, shores, or view. Woodsy terms like pine, oak, cedar, and mossy will work nicely. Animal names like moose, bear, dear, chipmunk, and squirrel always work. Who wouldn't wanna live at a place called Chipmunk Lodge or Moose Tracks Retreat? But please, avoid using terms like shanty, hut, or shack. Those won't help.
On July 1, there were 1,284 single family homes available in the twelve Lakes Region communities covered by this report. The median price point stood at $275,668 meaning that half of those homes were listed under that price point. There were 364 homes available under $200,000. That's a lot of affordable inventory! There's a lot to choose from and interest rates are still low so it is a great time to go look for your new home. You can name it "Nu Beginnings Lodge."
Pease feel free to visit www.lakesregionhome.com to learn more about the Lakes Region real estate market and comment on this article and others.
Data compiled using the NNEREN MLS system as of 7/1/15.
Roy Sanborn is a sales associate at Four Seasons Sotheby's International Realty and can be reached at 603-677-7012.
Last Updated on Thursday, 09 July 2015 07:22