Sanborn — Fall real estate sales tips

So, it is officially fall and with that should come a little bit of urgency if you are thinking about selling your house. You know you want to get it sold before the dead of winter sets in, but when the leaves come off the trees and the lawn turns brown it is not the most eye appealing time of year. There are some little things you can do to add some color and make your property more appealing. But you'll want to act quick as time is short before the weather turns nasty... you do remember last winter, right?

First things first. Get the exterior of your house looking good and do any paint touch ups before the paint freezes in the can. A coat of paint on the front door is always a great idea if it has become a little dull or faded. Spice things up and add a bit more color to an ordinary entry. First impressions are everything and they start at the front door. Some colorful mums on the porch or even some carved pumpkins would be in order given the inaugural Pumpkin Festival this year in Laconia.

Make sure you get the leaves raked up in the yard, the flower beds are cut back, gutters are cleaned, and everything is tidy in the yard. Buyers shouldn't have to walk through piles of leaves to view the property and if things are ship shape on the outside it shows you care about your property.

We've good some great holidays coming up and you can capitalize on them to create a great feeling for the buyers that visit your home. Tasteful decorations, both outside and inside, celebrating Halloween, Thanksgiving, and Christmas create warmth, add color, and add a bit of a excitement to a viewing. It can help buyers visualize themselves living in the home. So for Halloween you can start with the pumpkins and maybe a charming scarecrow in the yard and do some colorful accents and decorations inside the house. Just don't overdo it. Displaying bloody ghouls, goblins, and zombies might not work to your favor. The old baking brownies trick applies here as well but go for pumpkin pie or muffins to create the right aroma for the season.

The same holds true for Thanksgiving and Christmas (yes, it's coming!). Celebrate the holiday season and show people how well your home looks. Scented candles, a colorful cornucopia, a holiday table cloth with an appropriate centerpiece, and seasonal table settings are great to set the Thanksgiving mood. Dragging out a hundred piece Anna Lee collection of holiday characters might be a little too much. Remember, less is more.

For Christmas stay away from going over the top with the tacky blow up vinyl Santa Claus or the wire animated reindeers in the yard and opt for more traditional and simple decorations. A colorful wreath on the door, some garland, and a nicely decorated tree will be enough. Your house does not need to look like Clark Griswold's home in order to get attention and you certainly don't want something like Eddie's camper in the front yard.

This time of year it starts getting dark earlier so make sure you or your agent turns on all the lights. It is also getting colder so turn up the heat a bit prior to the showing and if you've got a fireplace or stove make sure there's a fire going. A little holiday background music might get them in the buying mood. Create some ambiance, create some interest, and just maybe you'll create a deal.

As of October 1, 2015 there were 1,211 residential homes for sale in the twelve communities covered by this lakes Region Real Estate Market Report. The average asking price came in at $568,894 while the much more meaningful median price point stood at $269,900. That means that half of the properties available were below that $269,900 mark. At the current sales pace this inventory level represents a 13.5 month supply of homes on the market.

P​ease feel free to visit to learn more about the Lakes Region real estate market and comment on this article and others. Data compiled using the NNEREN MLS system as of 10/1/15. ​Roy Sanborn is a sales associate at Four Seasons Sotheby's International Realty and can be reached at 603-677-7012.

  • Category: Columns
  • Hits: 19

Jim Hightower - A remorseless liar is running for president (FOR FRIDAY)

We've got a new darling in the GOP presidential race: Carly Fiorina!

Being the darling du jour, however, can be dicey — just ask Rick Perry and Scott Walker, two former darlings who are now out of the race, having turned into ugly ducklings by saying stupid things. But Fiorina is smart, sharp-witted, and successful. We know this because she and her PR agents constantly tell us it's so. Be careful about believing anything she says, though, for Darling Fiorina is not only a relentless self-promoter, but also a remorseless liar.

Take her widely hailed performance in the second debate among Republican wannabes, where she touched many viewers with her impassioned and vivid attack on Planned Parenthood. With barely contained outrage, Fiorina described a video that, she said, shows the women's health organization in a depraved act of peddling body parts of an aborted fetus. "Watch a fully formed fetus on the table, its heart beating, its legs kicking," said a stone-faced Fiorina, looking straight into the camera, "while someone says, 'We have to keep it alive to harvest its brain.'"

Oh, the horror, the monstrosity of Planned Parenthood! And how moving it was to see and feel the fury of this candidate for president!

Only ... it's not true. Although she dared the audience, President Obama and Hillary Clinton to go watch it, turns out that there is no such video — no fetus with kicking legs and no demonic Planned Parenthood official luridly preparing to harvest a brain.

So did Fiorina make up this big, nasty lie herself, or did her PR team concoct it as a bit of showbiz drama to burnish her right-wing credentials and advance her political ambition? Or maybe she's just spreading a malicious lie she was told by some vicious haters of Planned Parenthood. Either way, there's nothing darling about it, much less presidential.

I remember back in 1992 when the third-party candidate Ross Perot chose Admiral James Stockdale, a complete unknown, to be his presidential running mate. In his first debate, the vice presidential candidate began by asking a question: "Who am I? Why am I here?"

We should be asking the same about Carly, as she has recently surged in the polls of GOP primary voters. Her campaign is positioning her as a no-nonsense, successful corporate chieftain who can run government with business-like efficiency. During the debate, Fiorina rattled off a list of her accomplishments as CEO of Hewlett-Packard, the high-tech conglomerate: "We doubled the size of the company, we quadrupled its topline growth rate, we quadrupled its cash flow, we tripled its rate of innovation," she declared in PowerPoint style.

Statistics, however, can be a sophisticated way of lying. In fact, the growth she bragged about was mostly the result of her buying Compaq, another computer giant in a merger that proved to be disastrous — in fact, Hewlett-Packard's profits declined 40 percent in her six years, its stock prices plummeted and she fired 30,000 workers, even saying publicly that their jobs should be shipped overseas. Finally, she was fired.

Before we accept her claim that "running government like a business" would be a positive, note that the narcissistic corporate culture richly rewarded Fiorina for failure. Yes, she was fired, but unlike the thousands of HP employees she dumped, a golden parachute was provided to let her land in luxury — counting severance pay, stock options, and pension, she was given $42 million to go away.

But here she comes again, lacking even one iota of humility. Fiorina is throwing out a blizzard of lies, not only about Planned Parenthood, but also about who she is. She's the personification of corporate greed and economic inequality, and she's trying to bamboozle Republicans into thinking she belongs in the White House.

(Jim Hightower has been called American's most popular populist. The radio commentator and former Texas Commissioner of Agriculture is author of seven books, including "There's Nothing In the Middle of Road but Yellow Stripes and Dead Armadillos" and his new work, "Swim Against the Current: Even Dead Fish Can Go With The Flow".)

  • Category: Columns
  • Hits: 22

Froma Harrop - Twisted social media & mass murder

The first details about the mass killer at the community college in Roseburg, Oregon, were that he was a young man, lonely and full of hate. Of course he was. They all are.

Lonely young men full of hate have been with us since there were lonely young men. The modern phenomenon of their acting out their madness on a large scale started almost 50 years ago, when Charles Whitman climbed the University of Texas Tower and shot to death 16 people down below. There have been similar assaults against innocents ever since, but what accounts for the current rapid pace of what used to be rare, horrific events?

One change may be the growth of social media, creating an online community to ease the loneliness of these mentally ill time bombs — and perhaps endorse their perverse fantasies. The community lets the killers know that after the deed, which usually includes their death, they will have lots of people following them.

Christopher Harper-Mercer, who slaughtered nine at Umpqua Community College, had made an online reference to Vester Lee Flanagan, who murdered two former colleagues from a Roanoke, Virginia, TV station while they were on the air. Flanagan had referenced Dylann Roof, a young white man accused of murdering nine people at an African-American church in Charleston, South Carolina. Flanagan was enraged at Roof and then copied him.

In between, there was John Russell Houser, a rare older mass shooter, 59, who posted his political ravings online before killing two and wounding nine others at a movie theater in Lafayette, Louisiana. And he may have been copying James Holmes, who killed 12 and injured 70 at a movie theater in Aurora, Colorado.

The natural response after these multiple shootings is to blame lax gun control. The appalled father of Harper-Mercer went on TV and did just that.

Politicians agreed or not, depending on their fear of the National Rifle Association. Yes, bans on weapons of war and gun sales to the mentally ill are desperately needed. Looking back at these massacres, most of the weaponry was legally obtained.

But perhaps as dangerous as the flood of arms are the fumes of paranoia spread by the NRA and other peddlers of gun mania. What better audience for the instant-empowerment-of-guns message than depressed, lonely men.

Ours seems to be the only culture that uses guns for psychotherapy, as was well-portrayed in the movie "American Sniper". One creepy similarity between Harper-Mercer and Adam Lanza, who slayed 26 at an elementary school in Newtown, Connecticut, was that their mothers took them out shooting.

Certainly in Lanza's case, the mother bizarrely thought she could channel her boy's sick obsession with guns into a bonding thing. Both mothers had left lying around the house the guns their deranged sons used.

In the meantime, these lonely men find companionship, however imaginary, in these online communities of gun worship, places that often validate their paranoiac thoughts. (Many also seek refuge in violent video games.) What they desperately need is real community to offer reality checks and interface with mental health professionals.

Some law enforcement is trying to withhold the perpetrators' names to deprive the criminals of the celebrity they crave. These officers fully understand the motive, but their good efforts can't go far. The curious public does want to know names and the killers' grievances, however crazy, and media will provide them.

The bigger concern is the ugly public seething online, honoring killers past and certifying the most twisted worldviews. Social media have some very dark corners that encourage mass bloodshed, and what can we possibly do about it?

(A member of the Providence Journal editorial board, Froma Harrop writes a nationally syndicated column from that city. She has written for such diverse publications as The New York Times, Harper's Bazaar and Institutional Investor.)

  • Category: Columns
  • Hits: 72

Pat Buchanan - War Party targets Putin

Having established a base on the Syrian coast, Vladimir Putin last week began air strikes on ISIS and other rebel forces seeking to overthrow Bashar Assad. A longtime ally of Syria, Russia wants to preserve its toehold on the Mediterranean, help Assad repel the threat, and keep the Islamic terrorists out of Damascus.

Russia is also fearful that the fall of Assad would free up the Chechen terrorists in Syria to return to Russia.

In intervening to save Assad, Putin is doing exactly what we are doing to save our imperiled allies in Baghdad and Kabul. Yet Putin's intervention has ignited an almost berserk reaction. John McCain has called for sending the Free Syrian Army surface-to-air missiles to bring down Russian planes. Not only could this lead to a U.S.-Russia clash, but U.S.-backed Syrian rebels have a record of transferring weapons to the al-Qaida affiliate. The end result of McCain's initiative, sending Stingers to Syria, could be airliners blown out of the sky across the Middle East.

Hillary Clinton wants the U.S. to create a no-fly zone. And Friday's Wall Street Journal endorsed the idea: "Mr. Obama could make Mr. Putin pay a price. ... In Syria the U.S. could set up a no-fly zone to create a safe haven for refugees against ... Mr. Assad's barrel bombs. He could say U.S. planes will fly wherever they want, and if one is attacked the U.S. will respond in kind." U.S.-Russian dogfights over Syria are just fine with the Journal.

Saturday's Washington Post seconded the motion, admonishing Obama: "Carve out safe zones. Destroy the helicopter fleet Mr. Assad uses for his war crimes."

Has the War Party thought this through?

Establishing a no-fly zone over Syria, which means shooting down Syrian fighter-bombers and helicopters, is an act of war. But when did Congress authorize the president to go to war with Syria? When last Obama requested such authority — in 2013, when chemical weapons were used — the American people arose as one to say no to U.S. intervention. Congress backed away without even voting.

Unprovoked air strikes on Syrian government forces would represent an unauthorized and unconstitutional American war. Does the Party of the Constitution no longer care about the Constitution? Is a Republican Congress really willing to give Barack Obama a blank check to take us to war with Syria, should he choose to do so? Is this what America voted for in 2014?

A no-fly zone means U.S. warplanes downing Syrian planes and helicopters and bombing antiaircraft defenses at Syrian airfields. To Damascus this would mean the Americans have committed to the defeat of their armed forces and downfall of their regime. The Syrians would fight — and not only the Syrian army. For Russia, Hezbollah and Iran are all allied to the Damascus regime, as all believe they have a vital interest in its survival.

How would Russia, Iran and Hezbollah respond to U.S. air strikes on their ally? Would they pack it in and leave? Is that our experience with these folks?

Today, the U.S. is conducting strikes on ISIS, and the al-Qaida affiliate. But if we begin to attack the Syrian army or air force, we will be in a new war where the entire Shiite Crescent of Iran, Baghdad, Damascus and Hezbollah, backed by Russia, will be on the other side. We will have taken the Sunni side in the Sunni-Shiite sectarian long war. How long such a war would last, and how it would end, no one knows.

Whatever one thinks of Putin's policy in Syria, at least it makes sense. He is supporting an ally, the Assad regime, against its enemies, who seek to overthrow that regime.

It is U.S. policy in Syria that makes no sense. We train rebels at immense cost to fight Assad, who cannot or will not fight. We attack ISIS, which also seeks to bring down the Assad regime. And we, too, want to bring down Assad. Who do we think will rise if Assad falls?

Do we have a "government in a box" that we think we can fly to Damascus and put into power if the Syrian army collapses, the regime falls and ISIS approaches the capital? Have we forgotten the lesson of "Animal Farm"? When the animals revolt and take over the farm, the pigs wind up in charge.

For months, Sen. Tim Kaine of Virginia has called on Congress to debate and decide before we launch any new war in the Middle East. One wishes him well. For it is obvious that the same blockheads who told us that if the Taliban and Saddam and Gadhafi fell, liberal democracy would arise and flourish, are now clamoring for another American war in Syria to bring down Assad.

And who says stay out? Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders, both of whom also opposed the U.S. invasion of Iraq.

There is something to be said for outsiders.

(Syndicated columnist Pat Buchanan has been a senior advisor to three presidents, twice a candidate for the Republican presidential nomination and the presidential nominee of the Reform Party in 2000. He won the New Hampshire Republican Primary in 1996.)

  • Category: Columns
  • Hits: 63

Susan Estrich - A message to Hillary supporters

Do not panic.

Of all the candidates in this race, Hillary Clinton is the only one that most Americans could imagine being president. Think about it. Every day, people ask me, "Could (Trump/Carson/Sanders) ever be president? Could (Paul/Cruz/Rubio) ever be president?" Most of the time I just shrug, because winning the White House is only one measure of a "successful" primary campaign.

No one asks, "Could Hillary Clinton ever be president?"

What they're asking, more loudly each day, is some version of what the you-know-what is going on? How can the much-vaunted Clinton-political-genius machine be stumbling so badly in dealing with the home server situations? Doesn't anyone there know that you need to play to her strengths, not to her weaknesses — the biggest of which is almost certainly her defensiveness about admitting mistakes.

I understand why the Clintons see political opponents around every corner. It's quite simple, actually. It's because there are political opponents around every corner; how can there not be when you've been playing big league politics for as long as these two have? And if you aren't ready to take aggressive action to smoke them out, you won't be the frontrunner for president, which Hillary still is.

I do wish she had just stood up and taken full responsibility when this whole server business broke. Remember when Janet Reno took responsibility for the disastrous shootout at Waco, Texas, even though she herself didn't have much to do with it and certainly wasn't there? Her popularity skyrocketed — even though most people disapproved of the raid — because she took responsibility. Taking responsibility for things you yourself didn't do, or for acting on bad advice, is particularly appealing.

Blaming other people tends to be less appealing. Getting the story out, the whole story, as fast as you can, is the way to stop it from growing. That is, assuming there's not much there, which seems to be the case: it was a mistake to try to have a private server as secretary of state, and there was a relatively small number of e-mails that should not have been on the server under any circumstances. That is the outline of the story that has been plaguing Hillary for months now.
"Much ado about not much" is how most of her supporters see it. What worries them is the "campaign's" hapless handling of it, taking what could have been a contained mistake and letting it bloom into a question of character.

"Why didn't anyone tell her?" people ask me all the time.

One of two answers must be true, maybe both: People did tell her. There aren't that many approaches to a situation like this, and the approach that uses responsibility and transparency in one fell swoop has been the industry standard since Geraldine Ferraro did her endless press conference in 1984, unloading more tax returns than anyone could swallow in response to her initial reluctance to disclose them.

Either that, or Clinton is surrounded by people so eager to win her favor that they tell her what they think she wants to hear, rather than what she needs to hear. Every politician falls prey to this, which is why in many campaigns, senior operatives have a limited shelf life. Most of us like people who think well of us. I would rather hear how well I did than how poorly, rather be told that it wasn't my fault than that it was.

But here's the good news. It is October of 2015. We're still in spring training, getting out the kinks. If you're paying close attention, God bless you, but you're in the minority. The Clinton machine is getting the kinks out. But all the reasons that made you support her, all the reasons that make her the frontrunner, are as true today as they were the day before that server was discovered. This too shall pass, and the lessons learned may prove valuable when the World Series comes along.

(Susan Estrich is a professor of Law and Political Science at the University of Southern California Law Center. A best-selling author, lawyer and politician, as well as a teacher, she first gained national prominence as national campaign manager for Dukakis for President in 1988.)

  • Category: Columns
  • Hits: 174