GILFORD — The Budget Committe voted five-to-three with one abstention to name attorney Norman Silber to fill the one-year balance of the term created when Selectman Richard (Rags) Grenier was elected to the Board of Selectmen.
Silber said he plans on running for the Budget Committee in March 2015. The other two candidates who expressed interest in the seat, retired engineer J. Scott Davis and aerospace engineer Stuart Savage both said they were unsure if they would run in March.
Silber has been a Gilford taxpayer since 2005 and relocated here with his wife permanently two years ago. He described himself as a nearly retired trust and bankruptcy attorney who has three minor cases to complete before he is completely retired.
A long time member of the executive board of the Boy Scouts of America in Florida, Silber is now an member of the executive board of the Daniel Webster Council of New Hampshire.
He is also an recently appointed alternate member of the Planning Board and said he didn't see where there would be any possible conflict with the two roles but agreed to step down from the Planning Board or recuse himself from a particular item should a conflict arise.
He said that municipalities, like the Boy Scouts, never have enough money to do what they would like to do but said the members of the Budget Committee spend "your money and your neighbor's money."
Silber said his priorities are public safety, public education and public works. "We have to balance this with keeping taxes as low as possible," he said.
Nine of the 11 members of the board were there last night. Two of them, Kevin Roy and Fred Butler, said that while all of the three candidates were qualified, they would lean toward supporting J. Scott Davis because he actually ran for the seat in March and lost.
"My hesitation is that Davis came in fourth." said Butler. "He put his name on the original ballot."
Karen Thurston reminded the committee that they had decided at the last meeting to open the position to the general public when they could have appointed Davis at that time. She said it would have been a "waste of time" if the committee simply had people from the general public apply only to name the person who came in fourth simply because he came in fourth.
Speaking as a member of the general public, Conservation Commission member Doug Hill spoke in favor of Silber's appointment to the Budget Committee, saying the town had a "unique" opportunity to take advantage of his experience and skills in finance that are not normally available to municipal governments.
"He really know what the numbers are and where the money is," Hill said.
Voting for Silber were Kevin Leandro, Thurston, Grenier, Sue Greene and Jeffrey Beane. Voting against were Roy, Alan Voivod, and Chair Phyllis Corrigan. Butler abstained.
Because Silber was the first nominee and he got a majority of the votes of the members who were there, the other two candidates were never placed into nomination.
Last Updated on Friday, 16 May 2014 01:16
LACONIA — Belknap County Commissioners voted unanimously when they met Wednesday at the Belknap County complex to formally request a meeting with the Belknap County Convention to consider a request from the Belknap County Jail Planing Committee for a $2.96 million borrowing for improvements and planning.
Commissioners made the decision after being told by Belknap County Administrator Debra Shackett that she had not been successful in getting the Jail Planning Committee on the agenda of a May 27 meeting of the convention at which the jail will be discussed.
She explained that she had made a written request last week to Belknap County Convention Chair Colette Worsman (R-Meredith) to have the committee included on the agenda of the May 27 meeting but was told by Worsman that the committee could have 15 or 20 minutes of time during the public input session but would not be on the agenda nor would any bond issue be discussed.
Shackett's e-mail asked that the committee be placed on the agenda ''to explain our next steps and discuss the possibility of borrowing money to address the most urgent needs at the jail as well as continuing to plan for a new facility. We would also be available to answer any questions about the process to date.''
Worsman replied ''Yes, as always everyone is welcome to attend our meetings. If the Jail Planning committee would like to add their input that would be great. I will be placing one hour for public input on the agenda beginning with the Planning Committee. Please be sure it is limited to 15-20 minutes as I am certain most of us are well aware of their efforts to date. I also want to ensure there is time for other public input. Secondly this meeting is not scheduled for additional appropriation so that is not part of this meeting.''
The jail committee met last week, and, despite reluctance expressed by its chairman, County Commissioner Ed Philpot (D-Laconia), about committee members attending the May 27 meeting, reached a consensus that it should bring its plan for a $2.96 million supplemental appropriation to the convention and have County Corrections Superintendent Daniel Ward make the presentation.
The committee wants $360,000 so that it can begin work on a schematic design plan for a new jail, $1 million for replacing the HVAC system at the current jail and $1.6 million for a three-year contract for installation of a 48-bed temporary housing unit at the jail.
Shackett told commissioners yesterday that a bond issue vote would require a pubic hearing and that the request for the $2.96 million bond would need approval from two-thirds of the county convention's 18 members.
Philpot asked Shackett who might be speaking at the public input session the convention has scheduled for May 27 and she said that she had no idea.
''We have no idea what the purpose of the meeting is and who will be speaking,'' said Philpot, who said that the fact that the convention would even be talking about the jail might be seen as a step in the right direction.
The Jail Planning Committee meets again on May 20 at 6 p.m. at the Belknap County Complex and may consider whether it wants to accept being limited to public input only at the May 27 meeting or wait until the convention sets another date for a meeting at which it will be on the agenda and can make a request for funding for what it sees as major priorities for the jail.
Last Updated on Thursday, 15 May 2014 12:58
by Thomas P. Caldwell
BRISTOL — A state representative who also serves on the Newfound Area School District Budget Committee is alleging that the bonuses awarded to three administrators last month violated the Municipal Budget Act and could lead to the dismissal of the school board members who approved them.
Meanwhile, the new agenda format that allowed the board to make a hasty decision on the bonuses generated more than an hour of discussion on Monday night before a split board left it in place.
Rep. Harold "Skip" Reilly of Alexandria asked the Newfound Area School Board for permission to speak to the district's attorney about the bonuses before possibly proceeding to file litigation against the school district. He said that, while the budget committee had discussed the matter, it had not yet made a decision about what to do, so he was appearing only as a resident to seek redress of what he maintains was an unlawful act.
The board responded that a private citizen could not seek advice from the district attorney.
Reilly cited provisions of RSA 30 that he argued had been violated by granting a $5,000 bonus to Lori Lane, director of the After School 21st Century Learning Grant program, and $2,500 bonuses to Business Administrator Michael Limanni and Student Services Coordinator Anne Holton. Reilly said there was no line item in the budget for bonuses and therefore they failed to meet the law's requirement that money be spent for a specific purpose for which a provision had been made. He also noted that the expenditure had not been discussed in a public hearing and that the budget committee had not been apprised of the possibility of the bonuses being given.
School district administrators maintain that the bonuses are legal, as they fall under the salaries category in the budget.
School Board Chair Ruby Hill of Danbury noted that other school districts often award bonuses to their staff members without it being listed in a separate line on the budget.
Word of the bonuses created backlash in the district, coming as it did immediately after voters had turned down a negotiated collective bargaining agreement with the teachers' union and on the heels of a decision by the school board to eliminate a number of guidance and paraprofessional positions.
The money for the bonuses became available when voters at the annual school district meeting increased the budget amount recommended by the budget committee. Insurance costs also came in significantly below projections.
Susan Colby of Bristol stood to voice her displeasure with the decision, saying she was disgusted by the bonuses. "We have other non-union staff members and paraprofessionals who do way more than they were hired for, but instead of bonuses, they're getting pink slips," she said.
In recommending the bonuses last month, Superintendent Stacy Buckley said the three had put in exceptional effort and had saved the school district money through efficiencies and restructuring.
Residents and staff members were particularly upset with the largest bonus going to Lane, who had been with the district only a few months and who resigned immediately afterward without returning the bonus.
Just as controversial was Hill's decision in April to dispense with the agenda format that had been in place for many years. In an attempt to simplify the agenda and to more closely follow board policy, Hill had limited public comment to the beginning and end of the meeting and for agenda items only. In the past, town officials and members of the public could bring up any issue at the beginning of the meeting, although no action could be taken on items that were not on the agenda. The second public comment session had been after the school board had discussed all agenda items but before any vote was taken.
Former Chair Vincent Paul Migliore had objected to the change, saying that hearing from the public before voting had proven to be very valuable and, in some cases, led to him changing how he intended to vote. That break between the discussion and the vote also gave board members time to fully consider the issues, he said.
At Monday's meeting, Migliore asserted that eliminating that period to think about the agenda items was partially responsible for the approval of the bonuses. Other board members agreed, noting that there had been no real discussion before the vote.
Bob Brooks of Hebron took Hill to task for the agenda change, asking, "Was there any discussion among the board, or a vote taken, about the removal of that public comment portion of the school board meeting, or was it just decided upon by the newly elected chairperson, Mrs. Hill? ... If things can be changed without any prior discussion, then do you, Mrs. Hill, intend on running this board ... as your own personal fiefdom, or will you listen to what the public feels about this issue and any others that might come before you?"
He continued, "In your short rule as chair, you, in my opinion, are starting out at 0-2 with the first item under your reign being immediately challenged (the agenda), and also with the terrible decision made about the bonuses. Since Mr. Migliore seems to be the only member actually listening to or caring about his constituents' opinions (voting against the bonuses as one example), therefore to me being the only voice of reason, or if you will the conscience of the board, I would hope that more of the people who occupy the seats on the board remember that they are there because they got elected by the people, who also voted down any excess spending, and follow what I think, anyway, is his right way of thinking."
Hill said she did not intend to limit public comment, except as required by board policy which had not been followed under Migliore, and she noted that this month's agenda restored the public comment periods at the beginning and just before the vote. But she said if the board intended to continue allowing comment on non-agenda items, the board should amend its policy to reflect that.
When taking up the agenda change at the end of the meeting, Migliore spent a great deal of time explaining why his format had been adopted and why he felt the board should return to it. In addition to giving the board time to think before voting, the old format contained a checklist to make sure procedures were followed and that minutes were accurate. He noted that the board had to spend a long time Monday night correcting errors in the minutes which canceled out the savings a simplified agenda was supposed to create.
Saying he could understand Hill's concern about not following policy, he proposed a "board philosophy" stating that, if the school board chose to do something contrary to existing policy, it should be understood as superseding that policy and that the policy committee would as soon as practical amend the policy to reflect that change.
Don Franklin of Hebron objected, saying such a policy would allow the board to do anything it pleased.
Most board members agreed with Migliore on one point or another, but they were unable to come up with a replacement policy that all could agree with. Sue Cheney of Alexandria suggested using Hill's simplified agenda for posting the meeting, while using the old format to check off items as the board took them up. Another suggestion was to have a short list appended to the front to alleviate confusion while utilizing the old agenda format.
When, after more than an hour of discussion, it came time to vote on returning to the old format, Migliore and Ben Laroche of Bristol voted in favor, Cheney, Hill, and Franklin voted against the change, and Jeff Levesque of Groton and Christine Davol of New Hampton abstained.
Last Updated on Thursday, 15 May 2014 12:40
MEREDITH — The Inter-Lakes School Board on Tuesday night approved a $292,816, 39-month lease for Chromebooks, laptops and desktop computers which will enable the school district to provide every student in grades 4-12 with technology which will allow them to access information, resources and materials through the school district's computer system.
The district is leasing 450 Chromebooks, 162 laptops and 77 desktop computers with monitors for a three-year period according to Superintendent of Schools Mary Ellen Ormond, who says the funds for the lease are included in the school district budget which was approved by voters in March.
The district is implementing a 1:1 computing program which enables all students to have access to this technology whether or not their parents can afford it.
''It will be one child, one device,'' says Ormond, who said that the school district conducted a pilot program at the Sandwich Elementary School last year.
She said that the Google Chromebooks provide an inexpensive option and that the district already uses Google educational applications which involve ''cloud-based computing'' in which there is no on-site storage of data or programs. These are accessed remotely through the Google education websites.
She said that students will have remote access from their homes through the school's system and will be able to work on projects whenever it is most convenient for them.
A Chromebook is an internet access device running Google Chrome OS as its operating system. The devices, typically the size of a laptop, are designed to be used while connected to the Internet, though there are some apps that can be run offline. All the data is stored in the "cloud" accessed by an Internet connection. Chromebooks sell for around $150 to $300 and as of last November represented 21 percent of the laptop market in the United States.
Last Updated on Thursday, 15 May 2014 12:22
- Lily Pond park idea advances
- Judge rules prosecution failed to connect woman to Barnstead marijuana plants
- Money for Belmont High football coming from 'Friends', not taxpayers
- Responding to complaint that Bike Week is starting late this year, council will allow properly permitted beer tents to open 2 days early
- City Council to hold May 27 hearing on proposal to limit use of primary elections
- Director outlines timeline for development of new Laconia Master Plan