LACONIA — Lakes Region Public Access television will withhold its signal from a baker's dozen of towns in the Lakes Region that declined its offer to join the consortium and contribute to its operating budget.
Chan Eddy of Gilford, president of the Board of Directors of LRPA, said yesterday that Alexandria, Alton, Barnstead, Bridgewater, Bristol, Deerfield, Gilmanton, Hebron, New Hampton, Northfield, Pittsfield, Sanbornton and Tilton will go dark on March 20. Only Alton had been a paying member of LRPA. The other towns did not provide programming to the public access channels, but received the signal via MetroCast channels 24, 25 and 26.
Eddy explained that LRPA adopted a new business model in response to the new cable franchise agreement negotiated with MetroCast by a consortium of municipalities, which left the station scrambling to fund its operations. Traditionally, LRPA received an annual $30,000 grant from MetroCast and contributions from municipalities belonging to the consortium that negotiated the original cable franchise agreement with MetroCast. Those contributions were intended to come from the franchise fees MetroCast pays communities, based on the number of subscribers. The new cable franchise agreement eliminated the grant from MetroCast and enabled municipalities to produce their own programming.
The new business plan, which is akin to the models of public radio and television, calls for soliciting contributions from municipalities as well as sponsorships from businesses in the region. Eddy said that contributions have been received from the city of Laconia and four townships — Belmont, Gilford, Meredith and Northwood.
Last Updated on Wednesday, 04 March 2015 02:48
ALTON — Following a lengthy public discussion before a large crowd about how the Alton Central School District should be administered, the School Board decided unanimously Monday night to advertise for a full-time superintendent and a full-time principal.
The board said it ideally seeks a superintendent with skills in curriculum development and kindergarten through 8th grade experience. The position of curriculum directer would be eliminated under this restructuring.
The district will also be advertizing for a Special Education director and a Food Services manager. The incumbents will retire this year.
Alton Central School is a K-8 elementary/middle school with 515 students — down by about 15 students from last year.
With the resignation of current Superintendent William Lander and his decision to withdraw his application for one-year of superintendent and curriculum services contract using "YET", a company he formed with Gilford Middle School Principal Sydney Leggett, the district finds itself behind the proverbial eight ball.
Typically in education circles and according to ACS school board members, the ideal time to seek high level administrators is in January and February. With a March 27 deadline for applications that will sent to the board first and a later review by a citizens/teachers committee, the earliest the district could hire either position would be May 1.
Alton Central School has an assistant principal, Linda Wilmer, who has submitted all of her paperwork to become a certified principal to the state and who has expressed a desire to stay with the school should she become certified by the state.
She led the public input session with a gripe of her own.
Wilmer, who has become a social media target because her husband is the president of Profile Bank — the bank chosen by YET to ask for financing — addressed her concern for her family's reputation and demanded write-in candidate Barbara Howard apologize to them for her accusations of impropriety.
Ken Wilmer explained that as bank president, he has no active role in commercial lending, and YET's loan application like any other similar application, went to a different department.
He said the letter sent by YET to his bank was "worthless" and "not worth the paper and ink it was written on."
Howard did apologize but still maintained that Ken Wilmer was "operating under the radar".
Linda Wilmer said she didn't think Howard made a satisfactory apology and Howard left the rooms shortly thereafter.
Wilmer also noted that, in her opinion, the School Board was "dysfunctional." As examples she noted the turnover in administrators and that fact that the board has hired three previous superintendents who had created their own LLCs yet chose to attack Lander for doing the same thing.
She also addressed allegations of intimidation of employees by the board.
"The fear and retaliation should stop," she said, adding that children shouldn't have to fear not making a sports team because one of their parents spoke their mind at a School Board meeting. No direct evidence of retaliation was offered.
After the meeting settled down, the public spoke mostly about continuity in leadership.
Alton Teachers Association President Joan Cross and the many teachers who spoke after her, said four superintendents in as many years was too much for them.
She also said she sent a questionnaire with six questions to all of her membership.
Cross said two of the questions were irrelevant because of Lander's resignation and the withdrawal of YET as an applicant for the task, but the other four still applied.
She said 84 percent of the teachers (only two didn't reply) said they would like Wilmer to stay as principal. They described her as "approachable and hardworking."
Fifty-four percent were in favor of starting the hiring process for principal immediately while 44 percent were against it. Comments included additional support for Wilmer.
She said 81 percent of the teachers wanted some kind of consultation about the type of person who should be hired as superintendent and 19 percent were against it. In addition, 93 percent of the teachers felt parents should also be able to discuss the kind of person they want for superintendent while 5 percent said no.
There was also some discussion — likely to be addressed in the future — about declining enrollments and the possibility of combining elementary schools with Barnstead and/or Gilmanton in the future.
A few people mentioned that they were still concerned with transparency in the process as it goes forward.
At the end of the public comment time (which lasted almost two hours) parent Paul Monzioni who is also an attorney said the board should consult with its lawyers when hiring for a superintendent, especially if he or she has incorporated and added "LLC" (Limited Liability Company" to their name.
He said in his opinion, LLC's are businesses and the Right To Know Law does not give a company the same rights to be considered as "personnel" as defined. A superintendent who is acting on his or her own, said Monzioni, is protected by the personnel clause.
"Get real good legal information," he cautioned the board.
CUTLINE: (Lander) Superintendent William "Bill" Lander responds to a question at Monday nights Alton Central School Board meeting while board Chair Sandy Wyatt (left) listens to him. (Laconia Daily Sun photo/Gail Ober)
Last Updated on Wednesday, 04 March 2015 02:00
Burchell fears cost of added staffing will drive 'community corrections' jail model beyond county's tolerance for taxes
LACONIA — Richard Burchell (R-Gilmanton), who was apparently ousted as commission chairman by his colleagues Monday morning, gave a one-man presentation following the commission's meeting on progress on a plan being developed for a so-called community corrections center for the county.
''This is a discussion we should be having in Belknap County,'' said Burchell, who expressed skepticism that there was an appetite in the county for spending the amount of money he thinks it will take to build and staff an inmate rehabilitation and education center.
Burchell said that there was a meeting held Friday at the county jail which he attended along with Corrections Superintendent Dan Ward and Kevin Warwick and Ross Cunningham of Alternative Solutions Associates, Inc., the firm the county hired for $40,000 to develop a program for a community corrections facility.
He said that the study so far is focused on an approximately 30,000-square-foot facility with 64 beds which would cost between $7-$8 million and would require between seven and 10 new staff members.
Burchell suggested it would be less expensive for the county in the long run to build a $14-million jail along traditional lines because there would be a minimal staffing increase which would hold down future staffing costs compared to what it would cost for a community corrections facility.
The roughly outlined community corrections facility plan for the county would see 30 treatment beds, 20 for men and 10 for women, and 34 work release beds, 24 for men and 10 for women. The new facility, which would be built next to the current jail and possibly connected to it, would be of heavy commercial grade construction, several steps below the type of construction needed for a secure jail facility.
It would provide residential minimum security treatment as well as group space for programs.
Staffing requirements would be five correctional staff and a supervisor while program staff would entail three clinicians, two case managers, a full-time administrative assistant and half-time clerical position.
Burchell said that the Sullivan County Community Corrections Center, which county commissioners have eyed as a model for a Belknap County program, requires up to 300 hours of programming per inmate, which requires a large investment in staff.
He said that Belknap County Commissioners will need to take a close look at the associated costs, noting that if the staffing increase isn't funded a facility built to the community corrections standard would be ''a soft building which will get kicked to pieces'' by inmates.
Other key considerations under study include a control room replacement for the current facility with a complete security system for a cost of $350,000, as well as upgrade to the HVAC system for the existing jail with an eye to also having it handle the community corrections facility as well.
The initial recommendations by the consulting firm will be made to commissioners at a March 24 meeting with consultants providing recommendations for adjustments to the Ricci Greene plan square footage, which was 94,000-square-feet, in April. It is envisioned that the county would hire an architect in May to design a community corrections facility and review projected renovation costs to the current facility.
Last Updated on Wednesday, 04 March 2015 01:57
LACONIA — Belknap County Commission Chairman Richard Burchell (R-Gilmanton) was ousted as chairman by fellow commissioners Dave DeVoy (R-Sanbornton) and Hunter Taylor (R-Alton) Monday morning but he refused to acknowledge their action, maintaining that that they had no statutory authority to remove him. Burchell continued to wield the gavel at the short, chaotic commissioners' meeting at the Belknap County complex, repeatedly banging it on the table and yelling after every motion made by the other commissioners that they were out of order.
The bizarre meeting — or simultaneous meetings — degenerated into a shouting match as DeVoy and Taylor raised their voices in order to make themselves heard over Burchell's "out of order" rulings, which flew thick and fast. When the other commissioners signaled their decision to continue to press the issue of removing Burchell as chairman, he asked Belknap County Deputy Sheriff Dave Perkins to empty the room, but Perkins declined, saying there was no basis to do so.
Talking over Burchell, the two commissioners then elected DeVoy as chairman, Taylor as vice chairman and, Burchell as clerk, prompting him to say, ''you're both out of order. You have no authority to elect me as clerk.''
Burchell would not accept motions even when the other commissioners appealed his "out of order" rulings, maintaining that the "simplified" Roberts Rules of Order, which the commission adopted at its first meeting of the year, didn't allow that procedure. He cited an e-mail from Deputy Secretary of State David Scanlan which Burchell claimed said there was no procedure for removing him as chairman of the commission. Taylor cited another opinion from Scanlan which said that all decisions by the commission are made only by majority vote.
Later in the day Burchell filed a motion in Belknap County Superior Court seeking ex parte relief from the action of the other two commissioners, claiming that there is no statutory basis for his removal as chairman, which he maintains will be ''an invitation to chaos".
A hearing on the motion is scheduled for March 11 at 1:30 p.m.
He said following the meeting that he intends to continue as chairman ''until a court says I'm not".
At one point during the Monday morning meeting, when Burchell ruled Taylor out of order, the mild-mannered commissioner appealed to the audience, saying, ''you can see exactly why we need to reorganize.'' After being told later on by Burchell that he was out of order again, Taylor said to Burchell ''you're out of your mind".'
After it became obvious that Burchell would not yield the gavel, the other commissioners voted, again over Burchell's insistence that they were "out of order", to end the meeting without taking action on any other agenda items. Burchell said that they should ''remove themselves from the room'' and Taylor said to Burchell ''you'd do us all a favor if you resign (from the commission)".
DeVoy said after the meeting that ''this was a sad day for Belknap County. We didn't elect a king, we elected a chairman. And we've got to right the ship and get Belknap County moving again.''
DeVoy said that it has become obvious that Burchell is someone who can't handle the working relationships needed to lead the commission and that when the next meeting of the commissioners is held he intends to pick up the gavel and preside as the new chairman.
Taylor said after the meeting that he can't understand why Burchell still wants to hold on to the chairmanship. ''I hope he takes some time and does some reflection. We need to put the county first and he's not being a part of a team. Instead of working with us he went off and did his own budget. It's pretty obvious to everyone other than himself that he's not the right person to lead the county commission.''
After the commissioners left, Burchell sat alone at the front of the room and briefed the media on a visit made to the Belknap County Jail last Friday by consultants Kevin Warwick and Ross Cunningham of Alternative Solutions Associates, who are designing a program for a proposed Belknap County Community Corrections Center.
He said that preliminary indications are that it would actually be less expensive for the county in the long run if it built a larger jail rather than a community corrections center because the cost of adding 7-10 additional staff for the corrections center would be higher over time than the additional construction costs of a jail expansion, which wouldn't require a major increase in staffing.
Burchell began feuding with his two colleagues — all new to the commission and all Republicans — in recent weeks, when they would not sign on to his plan for eliminating jobs in order to meet a target for a reduction in the proposed 2015 county budget. The chairman boycotted a day-long budget workshop the commissioners held on February 13 because he believed they were going the call for an increase in expected county nursing home revenue in order to reach a similar numerical goal.
Last Updated on Tuesday, 03 March 2015 12:52
- Mitchell backs off plan to build large self-storage compound at Weirs
- Monday night crash on Hurricane Road in Belmont claims a life
- Accused said to have been drunk when he entered court
- Gilford School Board to hold special meeting to deal with vacancy at top of Middle School administration
- Lawmaker majority not buying relatively rosier revenue projections for Belknap County Nursing Home
- Wind closes Parade Road for a time