November House contests shaping up following primary

By ROGER AMSDEN, LACONIA DAILY SUN
Contests for the November election have now taken shape in Belknap County's nine legislative districts following Tuesday's primary election for state representatives.
In District 1, composed of New Hampton and Center Harbor, it will be a repeat of the 2014 race with incumbent Republican Valerie Fraser of New Hampton facing Democrat Ruth Gulick of New Hampton. Both women were unopposed in their respective primaries.
District 2, composed of Meredith and Gilford, will see Democrats John Anderson, Lisa DiMartino, Nancy Frost and Dorothy Piquado facing Republicans Marc Abear, Glen Aldrich, Norman Silber and Herb Vadney for the four seats.
District 3, Laconia, saw a contest on the Democratic side of the ballot for the four available seats with Liz Merry (617), Dave Huot (613), Tom Dawson (462) and Charlie St. Clair (430) winning nominations over Tony Felch (344). Republicans Frank Tilton, Don Flanders, Peter Spanos and Jim McCoole faced no opposition.
District 4, Sanbornton and Tilton, saw Dennis Fields (446) and Timothy Lang (240) winning Republican nominations over John Vorel (167), Robert White (168) and Richard Brothers, (162). On the Democratic side Richard Burke and Ian Raymond faced no opposition.
In District 5, Alton and Gilmanton, Peter Varney (714) and Michael Maloney (461) won Republican nominations over Gerald Theodora (162). Elizabeth Abbott and Hammond Brown won uncontested races in the Democratic Party primary.
In District 6, Belmont, George Condodemetraky and Diana Lacey were uncontested for the Democrats. Mike Sylvia (377) and John Plumer (264) won Republic nominations over Joel Weinrebe (198).
In District 7, Barnstead, Barbara Comtois (286) defeated Elaine Swinford (178) for the Republican nomination. Bruce Marriott is the Democratic nominee.
In District 8, Alton, Gilmanton and Barnstead, Raymond Howard Jr., was unopposed. There was no Democrat on the ballot.
In District 9, Laconia and Belmont, Democrat Beth Arsenault will face Republican Robert Fisher in a rematch of the 2014 race.

  • Category: Local News
  • Hits: 510

Road projects slow traffic along bypass and Route 106

By GAIL OBER, LACONIA DAILY SUN

BELMONT — It's going to be a while before there's free-flowing traffic along Route 106 as there are several ongoing road projects and construction can last until snow falls.

According to project engineers and a media representative of the state Department of Transportation, there are two projects happening in the Route 106 corridor simultaneously.

The first is a $7.2 million major road construction project schedule for completion in the autumn of 2017, in which the Route 106 from Dutile Road to South Main Street in Laconia is being redone. Some paving along this stretch will begin Saturday morning.

Project manager Chuck Flanders said that section will have a complete reclaiming and resurfacing, meaning the existing pavement is "chewed up," mixed with new road materials, regraded and paved.

He described this as a long-term fix which means the reconstruction should last for at least 20 to 25 years except for seasonal repairs and some possible top coat work in the future.

From Dutile Road south to Farraville Road, the state is cold planing or removing and replacing 1 ½ inches of asphalt in the travel lanes only.

Additionally, this project includes repaving the bridge deck of the Laconia Bypass that goes over Route 106. Flanders said that part of the complete repaving of the bypass was carved out so one crew could handle all of the traffic needs for that one area.

This project also included the redesign and reconstruction of the intersection of Seavey Road and Route 106, which was identified in the past five years as one of the more dangerous intersections in the state making it eligible for some federally subsidized grants.

Flanders said the only part of that construction project happening this year is done and that was to widen the area along Route 106 and install new utility poles. He said Eversource will coordinate relocating the lines and the actual construction will begin in spring of 2017.

Flanders said road crews are opening traffic to two lanes during peak commuter times in the morning and in the afternoon, but for the rest of the day, motorists can expect traffic to move along one lane only. He said the maximum wait is usually about three or four minutes, which he agreed seems like forever when one has to get someplace.

"We think traffic is moving pretty well through there, considering the scope of the project," he said, urging people who travel along Route 106 to give themselves some extra time to get to their destination.

Another project is the repaving of the entire bypass, much of which has been completed.

Additionally, there is the replacement of the Laconia Bypass deck that runs over Route 11A in Gilford.

DOT media spokesman Bill Boynton said that project was supposed to be finished on Aug. 5 but crews ran into some problems when the preformed concrete plates didn't fit exactly as the engineers had planned. He said there are times when traffic is rerouted around the overpass but said they expect that part of the bypass to be finished this fall.

09-15 Route 106 road work

Route 106 in Belmont has been stripped to the bare dirt along a long stretch just south of Laconia. Work on the road will continue through next year. (Ginger Kozlowski/Laconia Daily Sun)

  • Category: Local News
  • Hits: 749

Planning Board votes to proceed with proposal to rezone The Weirs

By MICHAEL KITCH, LACONIA DAILY SUN

LACONIA — Against the will of Planning Board Chairman Warren Hutchins, the board, by the narrowest of majorities, acceded to the request of the City Council by voting Tuesday to expedite  consideration of its  proposal  to redraw the zoning map and change the permitted uses of the commercial resort district encompassing The Weirs.

The board resolved "to refer the Council request to amend the Commercial Resort Zone to the Zoning Task Force and begin the review process." The five-to-four vote followed a lengthy, sometimes heated, back and forth between Hutchins and Councilor David Bownes (Ward 2), the council's liaison to the Planning Board. Bownes was joined in the majority by Charlie St. Clair, Jay Tivnan, Michael DellaVecchia and Bill Contardo while Edwin Bones, Gail Denio and Hamilton McLean voted with Hutchins.

The Commercial Resort District begins on Lake Street, just south of its junction with White Oaks Road, extends northward along Weirs Boulevard, includes the center of the Weirs and runs either side of Endicott Street North (US Route 3) to the Meredith town line. It also includes property along both sides of Endicott Street East (NH Route 11-B) east of the roundabout to just beyond the Weirs Community Center. Both specified commercial and residential uses are permitted throughout the district.

The proposal by the council would divide the district into two parts by carving a Commercial Resort Corridor District, designated CR2, out from the existing Commercial Resort District, which would become CR1. The corridor would be defined as the area extending 400 feet from either side of the center line of Endicott Street North (US Route 3) and Endicott Street East (NH Route 11-B) between the Meredith town line to the west and the center of the intersection with White Oaks Road to the east. Within the corridor residential development would be restricted to the upper level of buildings and then only if the ground floor of the same building were put to commercial use. In both the Commercial Resort Corridor and Commercial Resort districts the requirement to set aside a portion of lots as green space would be eliminated when the property is put to commercial use.

Last month, when the council endorsed the proposal, it agreed to ask the Planning Board to deal with it in a timely manner by addressing its major elements in October or November. Specifically, the council asked the board to schedule a public hearing as soon as possible in order to forestall property owners from submitting applications for projects under the existing zoning ordinance.

Hutchins told the board that after discussing the council's request with Contardo, the vice chairman of the board, he decided "our normal procedure applies." He said that the proposal has been distributed to members of the board for them to study prior to the next meeting in October. He said that Mayor Ed Engler, the architect of the proposal, will be invited to present the proposal at that meeting and respond to questions from both the board members and general public. Following what Hutchins said would be "similar to a conceptual plan review," the board would vote on the next step.

Bownes replied that he had a charge from the council and "your procedure for doing business does not quite conform to the specific charge that I have from the council." He said that the council is asking the board to treat the proposal as "expeditiously as possible." He noted that if a public hearing were deferred beyond November or December, it may not be scheduled until March, April or May when property owners at The Weirs are able to participate in the process. Some 100 properties would be affected by the proposal. Bownes stressed that the council was not "curtailing or shortchanging the process of review."

"We have a responsibility to ensure a thorough understanding of the proposal," said Hutchins, who insisted the board should follow what he called "our normal process." Describing the proposal as "very complex," he said that it should be referred the appropriate city departments, Zoning Board of Adjustment and Conservation Commission as well as the Town of Meredith and Lakes Region Planning Commission, because "this has a regional impact." He said "there is no sense of urgency from any standpoint," suggesting that undue haste could expose the city to litigation. Referring to state law, Hutchins said that while the City Council has "tremendous responsibilities, but one of them is not zoning. It is our responsibility." He said that it was especially important to follow procedure in the event there is litigation in order to not to be "subject to a change of procedure or political interference."

Bownes insisted that he was not asking to bypass any step in the process. "I'm just asking to get the ball rolling" by referring the proposal to the Zoning Task Force, which could report to the Planning Board in November or December.

Hutchins said that the Planning Board "did not know enough" to refer the proposal to the Zoning Task Force and begin the process right away. "There is absolutely no sense of urgency," Hutchins repeated. "The fear factor is just a smokescreen." He said that expediting the process would be "totally irresponsible" and asserted "this is our responsibility, not the council's."

With that Bownes offered the motion to refer the proposal to the Zoning Task Force and direct it to begin the review the review process.

After the motion carried, Interim Planning Director noted that the motion did not direct the board to schedule a public hearing, but will take public comment at its October meeting. Both Hutchins and Bownes stressed the importance of soliciting and receiving opinion from the general public.

However, when Hutchins suggested that zoning changes should follow, not precede, the adoption of the Master Plan, which he anticipated would be completed in six or seven months, Bownes said he is opposed to the proposal. Denying the charge, Hutchins replied, "I have a lot of questions. I consider this proposal very dangerous and I want to find out more. And I wanted each of you to find out more before you voted. That's our responsibility."

  • Category: Local News
  • Hits: 719

LDS RSS Feed