BELMONT — A recently released demographic study commissioned by the Shaker Regional School District shows a spike in the 2007 birthrate may create a temporary increase in the number of students who will attend Belmont Elementary School.
Like a wave moving across a body of water, the impact could first be felt at the elementary level and then into the middle school, reaching its peak in 2017 and ebbing as it moves through the middle school and high school in 2021 and 2022.
The "bubble," said Superintendent Maria Dreyer at Tuesday's School Board meeting, could mean the number of students attending Belmont Elementary School in 2017 could be as high as 522. Capacity at Belmont Elementary School is 450, she added.
"We know we had a surge in the birthrate but what we don't know is if they're still in Belmont," Dreyer said. "We'll have to make some definite plans."
Every two years the district contracts for a demographic study. It draws on data from the 2010 census plus enrollment numbers through 2012 from the Shaker district and the N.H. Department of Education. Data such as historical, current, and projected birthrates as well as state and local population growth rate were also factors. Housing data is also a factor.
The study is done by Peter Hofman and Catharine Newick of Canterbury.
Included in Dreyer's suggestions for space was the possible shifting of the fifth grade classes from the Belmont Elementary School to the middle school and possible shift the eight grade from the middle school to the high school as the potential wave moves through.
Right now, Belmont Elementary School teaches kindergarten through 4th grade. Canterbury Elementary School houses kindergarten through 5th grade although Canterbury 5th graders are given the option to go to Belmont Middle School if they choose.
The biggest concern for board member Sean Embry was in the kindergarten and first grades where class size is very critical.
Dreyer said that if the students who are part of the 2007 and after spike enroll as projected, it could mean the temporary addition of three additional classes.
She also noted that the spike in Belmont's birthrates in 2007 and 2008 seems contrary to the 2010 census data that showed overall birthrates in New Hampshire are declining. In addition, the data seemingly contradicts current enrollment numbers which are shrinking.
"The district has seen enrollment decline since the 2002-2003 school year having dropped seven times in the past decade," said Hofman and Newick.
In addition, birthrates in Canterbury and Belmont since 2006 are going in opposite directions.
In Canterbury, births averaged 30 per year from 2002 to 2006 and dropped to 21 per year in 2007 through 2011. In Belmont, the birthrate averaged 63 per year in 2002 through 2006 but jumped to an average of 81 per year from 2007 to 2011.
The report says that statewide, the number of children under the age of 5 declined over the 10 year period between 2000 and 2010 with the exception of Belmont where the number increased by 13 percent.
School Board members had little to say after Dreyer presented them with the study, saying they would review the entire document before moving forward.
Chair Heidi Hutchinson said she would like to see the district continue having the demographic study done every two years.
Last Updated on Thursday, 16 January 2014 01:42
7 Belknap County reps join small majority as bill to legalize recreational pot use passes N.H. House
CONCORD — When a bill to legalize the recreational use of marijuana carried the New Hampshire House of Representatives yesterday by the narrow margin of 170 to 162 on a bipartisan vote, the Belknap County delegation split evenly, with seven members in favor, seven against and four absent.
Among the seven voting in favor, there were six Republicans — Richard Burchell of Gilmanton, Guy Comtois of Barnstead, Charles Fink and Michael Sylvia of Belmont and Bob Greemore and Herb Vadney of Meredith — and only one Democrat — Ruth Gulick of New Hampton.
Five Republicans — Jane Cormier and Stephen Holmes of Alton, Don Flanders and Frank Tilton of Laconia and Dennis Fields of Sanbornton — and two Democrats — Lisa DiMartino of Gilford and Ian Raymond of Sanbornton — voted against the bill.
Representatives Beth Arsenault (D-Laconia), David Huot (D-Laconia), Bob Luther (R-Laconia) and Colette Worsman (R-Meredith) were absent and did not vote.
Modeled after legislation enacted in Colorado and Washington, the bill would allow individuals aged 21 and older to possess no more than one ounce of marijuana for recreational use as well as to cultivate as many six marijuana plants for personal use in a controlled environment. No fewer than 10 cultivation facilities would be licensed while the number of retail outlets would be no less than one for every ten liquor stores. Municipalities would be entitled to prohibit retail marijuana stores altogether or limit their number as well as to enact ordinances regulating their operation.
Marijuana production and sales would be taxed. A tax of $30 per ounce would be levied on marijuana sold or transferred by a cultivator to a manufacturer or retailer while retail sales would be taxed at 15 percent of the over-the-counter price. Supporters of the bill estimated that by taxing the cultivation and sales of marijuana the state could raise $30-million in revenue annually.
The Marijuana Policy Project applauded the House vote as being the first time a legislative chamber has voted to treat the drug like alcohol. "House members made history today and they are clearly on the right side of it," said Matt Simon, the group's New Hampshire-based New England political director.
Lawmakers have rejected decriminalizing small amounts of marijuana for recreational use in the past, most recently last session. But decriminalization supporters were encouraged when the state — with Governor Maggie Hassan's backing — made it legal for the seriously ill to possess and use the drug last year. Implementing the state's medical marijuana law is expected to take another year.
The bill will be referred to the House Ways and Means Committee then returned to the full House for a final vote. Should the bill carry both the House and Senate, Hassan has vowed to veto it. (The Associated Press contributed to this story).
Last Updated on Thursday, 16 January 2014 01:38
BELMONT — Selectmen were updated last week on an effort by a group of citizens to save the historic Gale School and urged the group to come up with some hard numbers for any plan it develops so that it can receive serious consideration.
''We've got to find a use for it which is beneficial to the town,'' acknowledged former School Board Chair Pret Tuthill, who, along with Ken Knowlton of the Conservation Commission, described the recent efforts of the ad hoc Save the Gale School Committee which they head up.
They said that this was a last ditch effort to save the building and Tuthill said ''if this effort fails it will be our last. The last thing we want to do is burden the taxpayers. We're looking for alternative sources of funding.''
Knowlton said that the building is historically significant and is in better condition than the Belmont Mill was when townspeople decided to save that building in the mid 1990s.
He said that when the town moves its offices into the mill in about five years the Day Care Center and Senior Center will have to move and that the Gale School could provide the space they will need. Or it could be used as a community center.
Knowlton said library trustees recently rejected a proposal to use the Gale School for an addition and that the school district doesn't want the building and has offered to contribute the cost of razing the structure to having it relocated.
He said the likely spot for its relocation would be on a school-owned lot on Concord Street.
Selectmen were sympathetic to the group's efforts to save the 119-year-old building, which is owned by the Shaker School District and sits on the shoulder of Bryant Field behind the Belmont Middle School, but unsure of how any effort to save it can proceed.
''Where is the money going to come from?'' asked Selectman Jon Pike, who suggested at one point that the chances for obtaining support for saving the building might be better at the annual Shaker School district meeting than at a Belmont town meeting.
''You'll get more financial support if it's a school project. If we get 50 people at a town meeting (deliberative session) we're lucky.'' said Pike.
That led Tuthill to point out ''it's not a Canterbury project'' and cast doubt on whether voters from that town would support any effort by the school district to save the building.
Knowlton and Tuthilll have suggested that funding for saving the building could come in the form of Community Development Block Grants, the same method used for saving the Belmont Mill, which led Selectmen Chairman Ron Cormier to say that one problem with getting grants was the question of ownership and whether or not a building which was going to be moved would be eligible for a grant.
''Which comes first, the relocation or the plan?'' asked Cormier.
Town Administrator Jean Beaudin said that she had just learned the night of the meeting that a joint application by the town and the school district could qualify for grant funding.
Linda Frawley of the Belmont Heritage Commission said that grants are available for the planning process for a project and that might be the starting point for developing a public-private partnership to save the building.
Selectman Ruth Mooney pointed out that the building ''has it's limitations,'' and is still basically an old school building with limited potential.
Tuthill said lightheartedly that if he could have his way he would tear down the current town hall and ''put it (the Gale School) right where the town hall is.''
He and Knowlton said they would keep selectmen informed about how plans for saving the building are progressing and would return with more details in the near future.
Last Updated on Wednesday, 15 January 2014 02:26
GILFORD — After 40 years as a teacher and administrator in New Hampshire schools, Marcia Ross has announcing her retirement as principal at Gilford Middle School, a post she has held since 2009.
The Gilford School Board accepted her retirement notice at their regular meeting last Thursday.
During those years, the Middle School has flourished, developed specific academic intervention programs, grown extracurricular participation in arts and athletics, and exceptional technology integration through cloud based computing, said Superintendent of Schools Kent Hemingway.
School Board Chair Sue Allen added, " We've been fortunate to have Marcia as principal of GMS for the past five years. The school motto, 'Be Respectful, Responsible, Resourceful and Confident' has had lasting impact on the Gilford community. Under her leadership our students have become motivated learners and better citizens. The entire community wishes her well in her retirement. "
"I have been fortunate to work with Marcia these past three years," continued Hemingway. "During my first year in Gilford with two interim principals, Marcia's experience and counsel helped me tremendously. Her knowledge of our children and families is deep. She has fostered a learning environment at GMS that supports achievement, creativity and collaboration. Her presence will be missed, but she has set GMS on a strong course for the future".
Prior to Gilford Middle School, Marcia was principal of Oyster River Middle School in Durham, and before that Assistant Principal of Gilford Middle High School from 1989-1997.
Last Updated on Wednesday, 15 January 2014 02:14
- Property maintenance code won't be on Belmont ballot
- Gilford BudCom strikes 2014 funds for regional planning commission
- Wild Meadows Wind Farm hits obstacles but developer still obtimistic
- Inter-Lakes students to be given more time to wash their hands
- Local man sentenced to 41/2 to 11 years in prison for theft
- Local man's mother files complaint against Belknap County sheriff for assault -990