LACONIA — Henry Lipman, the new chairman of the board of directors of the Belknap Development Council, says that the organization doesn't have to accept the aging demographics of the county as its destiny.
''We don't have to accept that as the way we are going to end up,'' said Lipman, the executive vice preside and chief financial officer at LRGHealthcare, who has also been a Laconia city councilor since 2005.
Lipman said the council plans to become a catalyst for investors and play a more direct role in driving new investment as a partner-investor and/or owner in property development in the county.
Outgoing chairman Sean Sullivan, who will return to his former seat as BDC treasurer, said that the organization has improved its financial position over the last year and is well poised to undertake new ventures.
The organization presented the Corporate Soul Award to Ryan Barton of Mainstay Technology for his leadership on the 200x2020 Initiative and former Laconia Mayor Michael Seymour for his inspired leadership in two terms as mayor, including his work with the WLNH Children's Auction.
The Winnipesaukee Playhouse was presented with the Community Impact Award for bringing professional theater to the Lakes Region. Parks and Recreation Director Kevin Dunleavy was also presented with a Community Impact Award for his work on the Downtown Riverwalk.
Former BDC Executive Director Carmen Lorentz was presented with a Founder's Award for her leadership during the last three years in which she helped revive the organization and launched many in ititiatives such as 200x2020 and Manufacturing Week. She is now Director of the State Division of Economic Development.
Cristopher Boothby, president of the board of directors of the Winnipesaukee Playhouse and Neil Pankhurst, one of the founders of the Playhouse, accept the Community Impact Award from Randy Eifert, a member of the board of directors of the Belknap Development Council, at the organization's annual meeting held at Lakes Region Community College in Laconia. (Roger Amsden photo for the Laconia Daily Sun)
Carmen Lorentz, former executive director of the Belknap Development Council, accepts the Founder's Award from Mark Eddleston, former president of Lakes Region Community College and a former member of the board of directors of the BDC, and Sean Sullivan, the outgoing chairman of the Board of Directors of the BDC. (Roger Amsden photo for the Laconia Daily Sun)
Last Updated on Saturday, 22 March 2014 12:55
LACONIA — Presented with three alternatives for carrying the downtown riverwalk across the Perley Canal to Beacon Street West, the Downtown Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Advisory Board split three-to-two yesterday in favor of recommending to the City Council a route through the residential complex rather than along the riverbank.
Originally Chinburg Builders Inc., the developer of the Beacon Street West Condominiums, planned to build a restaurant on the footprint of a building straddling the canal. The building collapsed under a snow load several years ago. The firm granted the city an easement along the river for the riverwalk, which would be incorporated into the design of the restaurant.
However, Chinburg has since decided to construct a 6,230-square foot building on the site, with seven residential units, two of which will overlook the river. Jeff Spitzer, senior project manager, told the board that the firm concluded that in light of market conditions a residential use of the property would be more economically viable than a commercial use. He said that while public access would be not only compatible but desirable in conjunction with a restaurant, there is a greater need for privacy with a residential building.
Chinburg presented three conceptual plans for the segment of the riverwalk from the completed stretch behind the Beacon Street West Condominiums across the Perley Canal to Beacon Street West. The first would take the riverwalk around the building over the canal to Beacon Street West by a flight of stairs. As this plan would not provide access for those with disabilities, the board rejected it.
The second alternative would take the riverwalk around the building, crossing the Perley Canal with a bridge then turning a corner before joining Beacon Street West. The third route would follow the path of the easement across the front of the proposed building fronting the riverwalk within feet of the windows of two residential units.
Chinburg has present its plan for the site to the Planning Department. This week the technical review committee, consisting of representatives of city departments, expressed its preference for the second alternative. Chinburg has offered to bear the cost of this route.
Board members Warren Clement and Ken Sawyer favored keeping the riverwalk on the river. "If we continue to compromise," Sawyer warned, "we'll wind up with a trail that doesn't follow the water as much as it should." Clement asked, "Are we concerned about not having a riverwalk along the river?"
Attorney Pat Wood said that the easement, although "not black and white," would likely entitle the city to build the riverwalk on the shoreline, but added "we may have the legal right to do it, but is it the right thing to do?" Stressing that Chinburg was willing to pay for construction of an alternate route, he proposed the board recommend the route preferred by the developer.
Kevin Dunleavy, director of Parks and Recreation who chairs the board, said he was "not surprised by Chinburg's position" and cautioned, "If we push, Chinburg may not build at all. They've offered a compromise here," he continued, explaining the firm granted an easement for public access through the Beacon Street West complex and offered to fund construction of the last segment. "I'd like nothing better than to have the riverwalk along the water," he said, "but compromise is necessary."
Chinburg is scheduled to present its plan for the site to the Planning Board on April 1.
Last Updated on Friday, 21 March 2014 01:20
LACONIA — The Government Operations and Ordinances Committee of the City Council last night agreed to direct the City Attorney to draft changes to the City Charter that would either eliminate primary elections altogether or authorize the City Clerk to declare a primary election unnecessary if no more than two candidates file for any particular office.
City Clerk Mary Reynolds initiated the proposal in response to the cost of conducting primary elections, at which very few voters cast ballots.
Once the proposed amendments to the charter are drafted, the committee will present a recommendation to the City Council, which will decide whether to begin the process of amending the charter, which includes a holding public hearing on the proposed changes and placing the question on the general election ballot in November.
The Government Operations and Ordinances Committee is chaired by Councilor Ava Doyle (Ward 1) and includes Councilors David Bownes (Ward 2) and Armand Bolduc (Ward 6). None of the committee members expressed a position either for or against eliminating or changing the primary election process.
In 1995 voters amended the City Charter to eliminate partisan elections, in which party caucuses nominated the candidates for mayor and City Council, and instead hold primary elections to choose the two candidates who appeared on the general election ballot. Primaries for city offices are held in September of odd-numbered years.
In a memorandum, Reynolds explained that since the change was introduced, relatively few primary elections have been contested, and very few voters have cast ballots. For example, in 1997, when the first primary was held, only one candidate entered the primary for City Council in each of the six wards and only two candidates entered the mayoral primary. With no contested races, just 7 percent of registered voters went to the polls.
In the eight primary elections between 1997 and 2011 voter turnout has averaged 9 percent. In 2001, when turnout reached a high of 18 percent there were four candidates for mayor, along with five city council candidates in Ward 3, three in Wards 4 and 5 and two in Ward 6. In three of the past eight elections — in 2003, 2009 and 2011 — primary elections were held even though there were not more than two candidates for either mayor or any of the six council seats. In 2011, only 259 of 8,422, or 3 percent of registered voters went to the polls, just 21 of them in Ward 2 and another 22 in Ward 5, at a cost to the city of approximately $39 a vote.
Last year when there were three candidates for mayor but no more than two for any of six city council seats the turnout was 6 percent.
Along with the mayor and city councilors, primary elections are also held to nominate candidates for the the seven seats on the School Board, whose members serve staggered terms, requiring a primary every year, and three seats on the Police Commission.
Reynolds said that cost of conducting municipal primary elections is approximately $8,600, which does not include about $1,000 for police details at the polling stations at Woodland Heights Elementary School and Laconia Middle School. The cost consists of $3,900 for printing ballots, $1,000 for materials at polling stations and $3,700 in wages of poll workers.
Laconia is one of three of the state's 13 cities to conduct municipal primary elections. In both the other two — Manchester and Keene —the charters authorize the city clerk to deem a primary election election unnecessary if no more than two candidates file for any particular office.
To spare taxpayers the cost of elections that more often than not are unnecessary, Reynolds proposed either adopting the procedure followed by Manchester and Keene or abandoning primary elections entirely.
When the committee met Bownes said he had received a phone call from former mayor and councilor Matt Lahey, who he described as "very much opposed" to eliminating or changing the primary process. Lahey, he explained, considers "the costs of holding the primary minimal compared to the possible consequences of doing away with them."
According to Bownes, Lahey harkened back to the election of the "Straight Arrows," claiming it proved "contentious and costly." His fear, Bownes continued, is that without a primary two "reasonable people" could file for office and a third candidate of "a particular persuasion" could join the race. The two like-minded candidates could split the vote, leading to the election of "a radical, a candidate who doesn't really represent the views of the a majority of voters in the ward."
In other words, Bownes said that Lahey believes that without a primary there is a risk that two-thirds of the vote could be split two ways, enabling a candidate representing a minority perspective to win the election.
"I'm just expressing a point of view," Bownes insisted. "I'm not sure where I come down this."
Bolduc countered that holding a primary would not prevent a minority candidate who mounted an aggressive write-in campaign from winning a general election against one or two declared candidates on the ballot.
"Write-in candidates," Bownes replied, "are different animals."
Last Updated on Thursday, 20 March 2014 12:52
BELMONT — Selectmen last night unanimously opposed being the sponsor of a federal community development block grant that would pay for a feasibility study for the Gale School.
Town Administrator Jeanne Beaudin told the selectmen she had spoken to Shaker Regional School District Superintendent Maria Dreyer and the private Save the Gale School Committee about sponsoring a possible U.S.D.A. Community Development Block Grant for $12,000, but said she needed selectmen's approval.
"How can we asked for a grant for a building we don't own?" asked Selectman Jon Pike.
Beaudin explained that a school district can't apply for a CDBG grant, but a municipality can. She said the town would only be a sponsor, but would not fill out the application and she was only acting as a conduit between the School District the CDBG.
The town doesn't own the Gale School. It is owned by the Shaker Regional School District and is on School District property. Built about 120 years ago, there has been a movement afoot to relocate the school to a corner lot near the Belmont Middle and Elementary School campus.
According to a letter sent to the town on Aug. 16, 2013, and made public at a Shaker Regional School Board meeting, the Gale School is eligible for the National Register, a determination made in 1985.
The letter said the Gale School "was listed ... as an important Colonial Revival-style building in the town. Many of these resources have irreplaceable architectural detail and historic import to the town."
In 1977, the Shaker District built Belmont Elementary School and relegated the Gale School to be used for cold storage.
Selectmen contended last night that while there have been a number of attempts to find the money to save the old school or possibly relocate it, there has never been any hint of evidence that the School District would spend the money needed to restore or relocate it.
"We don't own it, we don't see a use, and the town isn't willing (to spend any money on it)," said Selectman Ron Cormier who is the selectman's representative to the Heritage Commission, and is at odds with its other members who want to find a way to preserve the building.
He said he would support some kind of effort to save the bell tower and incorporate it into something in the village area. Others, including some members of the Shaker School Board and selectmen have, echoed this sentiment.
Cormier also said there have already been a number of feasibility studies done on the school and for selectmen to sanction another one by sponsoring a federal grant would be a "wild goose chase."
"Eventually, if we keep dragging it on maybe the building will collapse into itself," he said.
Selectmen's Chair Ruth Mooney said that if the School District is so interested in saving the school then they need to do the work.
Pike agreed, saying that if the town sponsors the grant it will be "sticking its neck out" and possible be on the hook for the entire restoration, especially since the Save the Gale School is private and its members can "walk away at any time."
"I'm not in favor of having a public hearing," said Mooney, referring back to Beaudin's original request. Pike and Cormier agreed.
"Just because a building is old, it doesn't need to be saved," Cormier said.
Last Updated on Thursday, 20 March 2014 01:04
- Laconia police to pay attention to distracted drivers
- Discussion of meeting minutes leads to dispute for Belknap County Convention
- Gilford Budget Committee to meet on April 5 to discuss filling vacant seat
- Belmont Fire Chief announces pick for new lieutenant
- Meredith’s Barnard Ridge among roads scheduled for resurfacing in 2015
- Main Street Bridge project delayed